Ethical issues in radiology journalism, peer review, and research

Douglas S. Katz; James B. Gardner; Jason C. Hoffmann; Michael N. Patlas; Puneet Bhargava; Mariam Moshiri; Erick M. Remer; Elaine S. Gould; Stacy Smith

doi:10.2214/AJR.16.16008

Ethical issues in radiology journalism, peer review, and research

Douglas S. Katz
, James B. Gardner
, Jason C. Hoffmann
, Michael N. Patlas
, Puneet Bhargava
, Mariam Moshiri
, Erick M. Remer
, Elaine S. Gould
, Stacy Smith

Radiology

Winthrop-University Hospital
Yale New Haven Health System
McMaster University
University of Washington
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Brigham and Women’s Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. Although some research and publication practices are clearly unethical, including fraud and plagiarism, other areas of research and publication, such as informed consent and conflicts of interest, fall into grayer areas. CONCLUSION. The purposes of this article are, therefore, to review a variety of relevant ethical issues in radiology-related journalism, peer review, and research; to review the radiology literature to date that has addressed these issues; and to present position statements and potential solutions to these problems.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	820-825
Number of pages	6
Journal	American Journal of Roentgenology
Volume	207
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.16008
State	Published - Oct 2016

Keywords

Blinding
Ethics
Informed consent
Journalism
Medical research
Peer review
Plagiarism

Access to Document

10.2214/AJR.16.16008

Cite this

@article{e5ff2df41192432285b9b0d13b77a17d,

title = "Ethical issues in radiology journalism, peer review, and research",

abstract = "OBJECTIVE. Although some research and publication practices are clearly unethical, including fraud and plagiarism, other areas of research and publication, such as informed consent and conflicts of interest, fall into grayer areas. CONCLUSION. The purposes of this article are, therefore, to review a variety of relevant ethical issues in radiology-related journalism, peer review, and research; to review the radiology literature to date that has addressed these issues; and to present position statements and potential solutions to these problems.",

keywords = "Blinding, Ethics, Informed consent, Journalism, Medical research, Peer review, Plagiarism",

author = "Katz, \{Douglas S.\} and Gardner, \{James B.\} and Hoffmann, \{Jason C.\} and Patlas, \{Michael N.\} and Puneet Bhargava and Mariam Moshiri and Remer, \{Erick M.\} and Gould, \{Elaine S.\} and Stacy Smith",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} American Roentgen Ray Society.",

year = "2016",

month = oct,

doi = "10.2214/AJR.16.16008",

language = "English",

volume = "207",

pages = "820--825",

journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",

issn = "0361-803X",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethical issues in radiology journalism, peer review, and research

AU - Katz, Douglas S.

AU - Gardner, James B.

AU - Hoffmann, Jason C.

AU - Patlas, Michael N.

AU - Bhargava, Puneet

AU - Moshiri, Mariam

AU - Remer, Erick M.

AU - Gould, Elaine S.

AU - Smith, Stacy

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © American Roentgen Ray Society.

PY - 2016/10

Y1 - 2016/10

N2 - OBJECTIVE. Although some research and publication practices are clearly unethical, including fraud and plagiarism, other areas of research and publication, such as informed consent and conflicts of interest, fall into grayer areas. CONCLUSION. The purposes of this article are, therefore, to review a variety of relevant ethical issues in radiology-related journalism, peer review, and research; to review the radiology literature to date that has addressed these issues; and to present position statements and potential solutions to these problems.

AB - OBJECTIVE. Although some research and publication practices are clearly unethical, including fraud and plagiarism, other areas of research and publication, such as informed consent and conflicts of interest, fall into grayer areas. CONCLUSION. The purposes of this article are, therefore, to review a variety of relevant ethical issues in radiology-related journalism, peer review, and research; to review the radiology literature to date that has addressed these issues; and to present position statements and potential solutions to these problems.

KW - Blinding

KW - Ethics

KW - Informed consent

KW - Journalism

KW - Medical research

KW - Peer review

KW - Plagiarism

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84989166091

U2 - 10.2214/AJR.16.16008

DO - 10.2214/AJR.16.16008

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84989166091

SN - 0361-803X

VL - 207

SP - 820

EP - 825

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

IS - 4

ER -

Ethical issues in radiology journalism, peer review, and research

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this