Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evaluation and treatment of rhinosinusitis with primary antibody deficiency in children: Evidence-based review with recommendations

  • Chadi A. Makary
  • , Antoine Azar
  • , David Gudis
  • , Anna Crawford
  • , Paavali Hannikainen
  • , Jean Kim
  • , Stephanie Joe
  • , Adam J. Kimple
  • , Kent Lam
  • , Jivianne T. Lee
  • , Amber U. Luong
  • , Sonya Marcus
  • , Erica McArdle
  • , Warren Mullings
  • , Brian P. Peppers
  • , Callum Lewandrowski
  • , Sandra Y. Lin
  • , Hassan H. Ramadan
  • , Austin S. Rose
  • , Lindsey Ryan
  • Elina Toskala, Fuad M. Baroody
  • West Virginia University
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Columbia University
  • Health Sciences Library
  • Northwestern University
  • University of Illinois at Chicago
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Eastern Virginia Medical School
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
  • Kingston Public Hospital
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • University of South Florida
  • Thomas Jefferson University
  • The University of Chicago

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: There is clear evidence that prevalence of primary antibody deficiency (PAD) is higher in children with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) than in the general population. The purpose of this multi-institutional and multidisciplinary evidence-based review with recommendations (EBRR) is to thoroughly review the literature on rhinosinusitis with PAD, summarize the existing evidence, and provide recommendations on the evaluation and management of rhinosinusitis in children with PAD. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically reviewed from inception through December 2023. Studies on the evaluation and management of rhinosinusitis in PAD patients were included. An iterative review process was utilized in accordance with EBRR guidelines. Levels of evidence and recommendations on the evaluation and management principles for PAD were generated. Results: A total of 50 studies were included in this evidence-based review. These studies were evaluated on the incidence of PAD in rhinosinusitis patients, the incidence of rhinosinusitis in PAD patients, and on the different treatment modalities used and their outcome. The aggregate quality of evidence varied across the reviewed domains. Conclusion: Based on the currently available evidence, the incidence of PAD in children with recalcitrant CRS can be significantly elevated. Despite the presence of multiple studies addressing rhinosinusitis and PAD, the level of evidence supporting different treatment options continues to be lacking. Optimal management requires a multidisciplinary approach through collaboration with clinical immunology. There is need for higher level studies that compare different treatments in children with PAD and rhinosinusitis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1776-1801
Number of pages26
JournalInternational Forum of Allergy and Rhinology
Volume14
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2024

Keywords

  • antibody deficiency
  • chronic rhinosinusitis
  • evaluation
  • immunodeficiency disorders
  • recommendations
  • recurrent acute rhinosinusitis
  • treatment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation and treatment of rhinosinusitis with primary antibody deficiency in children: Evidence-based review with recommendations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this