Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evaluation of previously embolized intracranial aneurysms: Inter-and intra-rater reliability among neurosurgeons and interventional neuroradiologists

  • Scott L. Zuckerman
  • , Nikita Lakomkin
  • , Jordan A. Magarik
  • , Jan Vargas
  • , Marcus Stephens
  • , Babatunde Akinpelu
  • , Alejandro M. Spiotta
  • , Azam Ahmed
  • , Adam S. Arthur
  • , David Fiorella
  • , Ricardo Hanel
  • , Joshua A. Hirsch
  • , Ferdinand K. Hui
  • , Robert F. James
  • , David F. Kallmes
  • , Philip M. Meyers
  • , David B. Niemann
  • , Peter Rasmussen
  • , Raymond D. Turner
  • , Babu G. Welch
  • J. Mocco
  • Vanderbilt University
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • University of Arkansas at Little Rock
  • University of Washington
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center
  • Baptist Neurological Institute
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • University of Louisville
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • Columbia University
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background The angiographic evaluation of previously coiled aneurysms can be difficult yet remains critical for determining re-treatment. Objective The main objective of this study was to determine the inter-rater reliability for both the Raymond Scale and per cent embolization among a group of neurointerventionalists evaluating previously embolized aneurysms. Methods A panel of 15 neurointerventionalists examined 92 distinct cases of immediate post-coil embolization and 1 year post-embolization angiographs. Each case was presented four times throughout the study, along with alterations in demographics in order to evaluate intra-rater reliability. All respondents were asked to provide the per cent embolization (0-100%) and Raymond Scale grade (1-3) for each aneurysm. Inter-rater reliability was evaluated by computing weighted kappa values (for the Raymond Scale) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for per cent embolization. Results 10 neurosurgeons and 5 interventional neuroradiologists evaluated 368 simulated cases. The agreement among all readers employing the Raymond Scale was fair (κ =0.35) while concordance in per cent embolization was good (ICC=0.64). Clinicians with fewer than 10 years of experience demonstrated a significantly greater level of agreement than the group with greater than 10 years (κ =0.39 and ICC=0.70 vs κ =0.28 and ICC=0.58). When the same aneurysm was presented multiple times, clinicians demonstrated excellent consistency when assessing per cent embolization (ICC=0.82), but moderate agreement when employing the Raymond classification (κ =0.58). Conclusions Identifying the per cent embolization in previously coiled aneurysms resulted in good inter- and intra-rater agreement, regardless of years of experience. The strong agreement among providers employing per cent embolization may make it a valuable tool for embolization assessment in this patient population.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)464-468
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
Volume10
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018

Keywords

  • aneurysm
  • angiography
  • coil

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of previously embolized intracranial aneurysms: Inter-and intra-rater reliability among neurosurgeons and interventional neuroradiologists'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this