Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evaluation of the redesigned conformable GORE TAG thoracic endoprosthesis for traumatic aortic transection

  • Mark A. Farber
  • , Joseph S. Giglia
  • , Benjamin W. Starnes
  • , Scott L. Stevens
  • , Jeremiah Holleman
  • , Rabih Chaer
  • , Jon S. Matsumura
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • University of Cincinnati
  • University of Washington
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center
  • Carolinas Medical Center
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

44 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the conformable GORE TAG thoracic endoprosthesis (CTAG) device (W. L. Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) for the endovascular repair of traumatic aortic transections. Methods: A prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter trial was conducted at 21 sites. Primary safety end points included 30-day all-cause mortality. The effectiveness end point was freedom from a major device event requiring reintervention through 1-month follow-up. Results: Fifty-one subjects were enrolled between December 2009 and January 2011 with polytraumatic injuries and a mean Injury Severity Score of 32 ± 14. The proximal mean intimal aortic diameter measured 24 mm, while the mean distal intimal diameter was 22 mm. A total of 57 CTAG devices were implanted (mean, 1.1/subject; range, 1-2) with a mean patient age of 44 years (range, 21-87) and a male-to-female ratio of 2:1. Technical success was 100% with an operative mortality of 0%. Femoral access was utilized in 96% of patients. The mean procedure time and blood loss was 105 minutes and 148 mL, respectively. All subjects required admission to an intensive care unit with a mean hospital stay of 14.6 days. Adjuvant techniques (ie, lumbar drains and induced hypertension) to prevent paraplegia were used in only 7.8% of patients. No patient developed paraplegia despite 63% having complete or partial left subclavian artery coverage and only 9% of those receiving left subclavian artery revascularization. In addition, there were no device compressions or major device events reported. Overall mortality at 30 days was 7.8%, and all were adjudicated by the clinical events committee as not being device or procedure related. Serious adverse events occurred in 39.2% of patients through 30 days. To date, there have been no conversions to open repair. Two site-reported endoleaks were detected during the mean follow-up of 4.2 months, which did not require reintervention. Conclusions: The CTAG device was demonstrated to be a safe and effective treatment for traumatic aortic transection based on 30-day outcomes. There were no device-related serious adverse events.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)651-658
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Vascular Surgery
Volume58
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of the redesigned conformable GORE TAG thoracic endoprosthesis for traumatic aortic transection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this