Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evidence for increased hominid diversity in the Early to Middle Pleistocene of Indonesia

  • Clément Zanolli
  • , Ottmar Kullmer
  • , Jay Kelley
  • , Anne Marie Bacon
  • , Fabrice Demeter
  • , Jean Dumoncel
  • , Luca Fiorenza
  • , Frederick E. Grine
  • , Jean Jacques Hublin
  • , Anh Tuan Nguyen
  • , Thi Mai Huong Nguyen
  • , Lei Pan
  • , Burkhard Schillinger
  • , Friedemann Schrenk
  • , Matthew M. Skinner
  • , Xueping Ji
  • , Roberto Macchiarelli
  • Université de Bordeaux
  • Laboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique, CNRS, Université Paul Sabatier
  • Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung
  • Goethe University Frankfurt
  • Arizona State University
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • Harvard University
  • Université Paris Descartes
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
  • Muséum national d'histoire naturelle
  • Monash University
  • University of New England
  • Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
  • The Institute of Archaeology
  • CAS - Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology
  • CAS - Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology
  • Technical University of Munich
  • University of Kent
  • Yunnan Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology
  • Yunnan University
  • Université de Poitiers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

62 Scopus citations

Abstract

Since the first discovery of Pithecanthropus (Homo) erectus by E. Dubois at Trinil in 1891, over 200 hominid dentognathic remains have been collected from the Early to Middle Pleistocene deposits of Java, Indonesia, forming the largest palaeoanthropological collection in South East Asia. Most of these fossils are currently attributed to H. erectus. However, because of the substantial morphological and metric variation in the Indonesian assemblage, some robust specimens, such as the partial mandibles Sangiran 5 and Sangiran 6a, were formerly variably allocated to other taxa (Meganthropus palaeojavanicus, Pithecanthropus dubius, Pongo sp.). To resolve the taxonomic uncertainty surrounding these and other contentious Indonesian hominid specimens, we used occlusal fingerprint analysis (OFA) to reconstruct their chewing kinematics; we also used various morphometric approaches based on microtomography to examine the internal dental structures. Our results confirm the presence of Meganthropus as a Pleistocene Indonesian hominid distinct from Pongo, Gigantopithecus and Homo, and further reveal that Dubois’s H. erectus paratype molars from 1891 are not hominin (human lineage), but instead are more likely to belong to Meganthropus.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)755-764
Number of pages10
JournalNature Ecology and Evolution
Volume3
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence for increased hominid diversity in the Early to Middle Pleistocene of Indonesia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this