Experimental evidence that competition strength scales with ecological similarity: a case study using Anolis lizards

Interspecific competition is widely considered a powerful process underlying species coexistence and ecological community structure. Although coexistence theory predicts stronger competition between more ecologically similar species, empirical support has largely relied on inferring competition from patterns of species co-occurrence. Coexistence theory also posits that species can only coexist when individuals compete more with conspecifics than with other species, however, few field studies—particularly in reptiles—have simultaneously estimated the strength of both intra- and interspecific competition among co-occurring species. Using an array of 12 experimental plots, we manipulated species presence and population size by plot of three native Anolis lizard species to empirically estimate the strength of competition on one anole species driven by two other species of varying ecological similarity. We observed that the strength of competition—as determined by relative growth rates and gravidity—was highly predictable and correlated to ecological similarity. Interspecific competition was strongest among species of highest ecological similarity, and intraspecific competition—induced by the addition or removal of conspecifics—was consistently the most intense. By employing direct experimental manipulations, our study provides an empirical investigation of the strength of competition as it relates to ecological similarity.