Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Experimental study of the reactions e+e-e+e- and e+e- at 29 GeV

  • M. Derrick
  • , K. K. Gan
  • , P. Kooijman
  • , J. S. Loos
  • , B. Musgrave
  • , L. E. Price
  • , J. Schlereth
  • , K. Sugano
  • , J. M. Weiss
  • , D. E. Wood
  • , D. Blockus
  • , B. Brabson
  • , S. W. Gray
  • , C. Jung
  • , H. Neal
  • , H. Ogren
  • , D. R. Rust
  • , M. Valdata-Nappi
  • , C. Akerlof
  • , G. Bonvicini
  • J. Chapman, D. Errede, N. Harnew, P. Kesten, D. I. Meyer, D. Nitz, A. A. Seidl, R. Thun, T. Trinko, M. Willutzky, S. Abachi, P. Baringer, I. Beltrami, B. G. Bylsma, R. Debonte, D. Koltick, F. J. Loeffler, E. H. Low, U. Mallik, R. L. McIlwain, D. H. Miller, C. R. Ng, L. K. Rangan, E. I. Shibata, B. Cork
  • Argonne National Laboratory
  • Indiana University Bloomington
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Purdue University
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

40 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper reports measurements of the differential cross sections for the reactions e+e-'e+e- (Bhabha scattering) and e+e-' (-pair production). The reactions are studied at a center-of-mass energy of 29 GeV and in the polar-angular region -costheta -<0.55. A direct cross-section comparison between these two reactions provides a sensitive test of the predictions of quantum electrodynamics (QED) to order ±3. When the ratio of -pair to Bhabha experimental cross sections, integrated over -costheta -<0.55, is divided by the same ratio predicted from ±3 QED theory, the result is 1.007±0.009±0.008. The 95%-confidence limits on the QED-cutoff parameters are +>154 GeV and ->220 GeV for Bhabha scattering, and +>59 GeV and ->59 GeV for -pair production.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3286-3303
Number of pages18
JournalPhysical Review D
Volume34
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 1986

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Experimental study of the reactions e+e-e+e- and e+e- at 29 GeV'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this