Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Explaining sex discrepancies in sterilization rates in the United States: An evidence-informed commentary

  • Stony Brook University
  • University of California at Los Angeles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Context: With abortion no longer deemed a constitutional right in the United States (US), the importance of effective contraceptive methods cannot be overstated. Both male sterilization (vasectomy) and female sterilization (tubal ligation) have the lowest failure rates of available means of contraception. Despite the less invasive and reversible nature of vasectomy compared to tubal ligation procedures and even though some healthcare professionals dissuade certain women, especially those who are white and/or economically advantaged, from undergoing a sterilization procedure, female sterilization is approximately three times more prevalent than male sterilization in the US. Purpose: We suggest that the discrepancy in sterilization rates is attributable to the burdens of pregnancy and birth experienced by women, beliefs that pregnancy prevention is a woman's responsibility, a dearth of sex education that results in lack of knowledge and poor understanding of contraception, perceptions of masculinity in which contraception is viewed as feminizing, and the increase in long-term singlehood that shapes the desire of individuals to avoid unwanted pregnancy that may result in single parenting. Implications: Recent reports suggest that court rulings restricting abortion access and looming threats to contraceptive legality and accessibility may be prompting a national increase in male sterilization.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)116-121
Number of pages6
JournalPerspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
Volume55
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Explaining sex discrepancies in sterilization rates in the United States: An evidence-informed commentary'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this