TY - JOUR
T1 - Factors Affecting Outcomes of Hindfoot Fusion Nails for Acute Injury
T2 - A Multicenter Study
AU - Kim, Eugene
AU - Tornetta, Paul
AU - Carlson, Jon B.
AU - Schultz, Alex
AU - Wireman, Garrett
AU - Ollivere, Benjamin
AU - Zheng, Amy
AU - Spitler, Clay
AU - Patch, David
AU - White, Tim
AU - Heinz, Nicholas
AU - Stinner, Daniel
AU - Lahurd, Caroline Elizabeth
AU - Ostrum, Robert
AU - Baumann, Charles
AU - Kottmeier, Stephen
AU - Doany, Michael
AU - Krause, Peter
AU - Redlich, Nathan
AU - Egol, Kenneth
AU - Konda, Sanjit
AU - Mir, Hassan
AU - McCaskey, Meghan
AU - Azer, Emil
AU - Kusler, Jace
AU - Beltran, Michael
AU - Mehta, Samir
AU - Masada, Kendall
AU - Hidden, Krystin A.
AU - Kuttner, Nicolas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025
PY - 2026/3
Y1 - 2026/3
N2 - OBJECTIVE: – To evaluate the effect of joint preparation and patient factors on outcomes and complications in patients treated acutely with hindfoot fusion nails for ankle and pilon fractures.METHODS: – Design: – Retrospective chart review.Setting: – Thirteen US trauma centers and 2 UK trauma centers.Patient Selection Criteria: – Ankle and pilon fractures (AO-OTA types A-C) from 2010 to 2020 acutely treated definitively with hindfoot fusion nail were reviewed. Patients at least 18 years old and with minimum 6 months follow-up or earlier diagnosis of complication were included. Exclusion criteria included nonambulatory at baseline, prior internal fixation that failed and underwent revision, and prior tibiotalar or subtalar arthrodesis.Outcome Measurements and Comparisons: – The primary outcome was final postoperative ambulatory status. Secondary outcomes were infectious and fracture-related complications.RESULTS: – One hundred forty-nine patients (75 men; 74 women; age 20–99; median 63 years) were treated for ankle (104) or pilon (45; 8A, 13B, 24C) fractures. Eighty-five patients (44%) had open fractures and 55 (37%) had diabetes. Thirty-six patients (24%) had joint preparation at the time of surgery. Forty-five (30%) were made weight bearing as tolerated postoperatively; the median time to mobilize was 1.5 days (0–210) and to full weight bearing was 35 days (0–1462). Fifty-seven patients (85%) returned to their preinjury ambulatory status, which was not affected by joint preparation (50% vs. 59%, P = 0.327). Joint preparation led to higher articular fusion rates (94% vs. 24%; P = 0.001) and fewer hardware removals (19% vs. 42%, P = 0.013), but trended toward a higher fracture nonunion rate (19% vs. 8%, P = 0.053). Forty-five patients (30%) had infectious complications, 60 (40%) had a fracture-related complication, and 67 (45%) had additional procedures. Open fractures did not lead to any differences in superficial or deep infection. Insulin-dependent diabetes was associated with higher rates of infectious complications (31% vs. 15%, P = 0.028) and amputation (17% vs. 4%, P = 0.029).CONCLUSIONS: – Hindfoot fusion nails for acute ankle and pilon injuries had high complication rates. More complications occurred in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes. While 95% regained ambulation, only 57% returned to preoperative status. Joint preparation led to higher rates of articular fusion (94% vs. 24%, P < 0.001) but not fracture union (81% vs. 66%, P = 0.106).LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: – Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
AB - OBJECTIVE: – To evaluate the effect of joint preparation and patient factors on outcomes and complications in patients treated acutely with hindfoot fusion nails for ankle and pilon fractures.METHODS: – Design: – Retrospective chart review.Setting: – Thirteen US trauma centers and 2 UK trauma centers.Patient Selection Criteria: – Ankle and pilon fractures (AO-OTA types A-C) from 2010 to 2020 acutely treated definitively with hindfoot fusion nail were reviewed. Patients at least 18 years old and with minimum 6 months follow-up or earlier diagnosis of complication were included. Exclusion criteria included nonambulatory at baseline, prior internal fixation that failed and underwent revision, and prior tibiotalar or subtalar arthrodesis.Outcome Measurements and Comparisons: – The primary outcome was final postoperative ambulatory status. Secondary outcomes were infectious and fracture-related complications.RESULTS: – One hundred forty-nine patients (75 men; 74 women; age 20–99; median 63 years) were treated for ankle (104) or pilon (45; 8A, 13B, 24C) fractures. Eighty-five patients (44%) had open fractures and 55 (37%) had diabetes. Thirty-six patients (24%) had joint preparation at the time of surgery. Forty-five (30%) were made weight bearing as tolerated postoperatively; the median time to mobilize was 1.5 days (0–210) and to full weight bearing was 35 days (0–1462). Fifty-seven patients (85%) returned to their preinjury ambulatory status, which was not affected by joint preparation (50% vs. 59%, P = 0.327). Joint preparation led to higher articular fusion rates (94% vs. 24%; P = 0.001) and fewer hardware removals (19% vs. 42%, P = 0.013), but trended toward a higher fracture nonunion rate (19% vs. 8%, P = 0.053). Forty-five patients (30%) had infectious complications, 60 (40%) had a fracture-related complication, and 67 (45%) had additional procedures. Open fractures did not lead to any differences in superficial or deep infection. Insulin-dependent diabetes was associated with higher rates of infectious complications (31% vs. 15%, P = 0.028) and amputation (17% vs. 4%, P = 0.029).CONCLUSIONS: – Hindfoot fusion nails for acute ankle and pilon injuries had high complication rates. More complications occurred in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes. While 95% regained ambulation, only 57% returned to preoperative status. Joint preparation led to higher rates of articular fusion (94% vs. 24%, P < 0.001) but not fracture union (81% vs. 66%, P = 0.106).LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: – Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
KW - ankle fracture
KW - hindfoot fusion nail
KW - joint preparation
KW - pilon fracture
KW - tibiotalocalcaneal nail
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105030222090
U2 - 10.1097/BOT.0000000000003104
DO - 10.1097/BOT.0000000000003104
M3 - Article
C2 - 41685944
AN - SCOPUS:105030222090
SN - 0890-5339
VL - 40
SP - 148
EP - 154
JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
IS - 3
ER -