Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

First multi-institutional systematic comparison of the neutron ambient dose equivalent produced by proton therapy systems

  • Arash Darafsheh
  • , Yao Hao
  • , Anissa Bey
  • , Michele M. Kim
  • , Eric S. Diffenderfer
  • , Lingshu Yin
  • , Chin Cheng Chen
  • , Zhiyan Xiao
  • , S. Murty Goddu
  • , Gabriele Zorloni
  • , Paolo Grignani
  • , Katia Parodi
  • , Kelly Davidson
  • , Tiezhi Zhang
  • , Stephanie Perkins
  • , Lee G. Sobotka
  • , Sina Mossahebi
  • Washington University St. Louis
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • University of Cincinnati
  • Else Nuclear S.r.L.
  • Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
  • Michigan State University
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective. Isochronous cyclotrons, synchrocyclotrons, and synchrotrons are used to accelerate protons for proton therapy. An accurate measurement of neutron doses generated by these accelerators and associated delivery systems and its clinical relevance requires systematic protocols and proper neutron dosimetry for a meaningful assessment. We present the first comprehensive comparison of neutron ambient dose equivalent (H*(10)) produced by clinically operational proton therapy systems. Approach. Treatment plans with 10 cm modulation-depth and ranges of 10 cm (R10M10) and 25 cm (R25M10) were created to cover a 10 × 10 × 10 cm3 water target. The pencil beam scanning proton therapy machines studied were: two gantry-mounted synchrocyclotrons (Hyperscan, Mevion, half-gantry), two isochronous cyclotrons (ProBeam, Varian, full-gantry), one isochronous cyclotron (Proteus, IBA, full-gantry), and two synchrotrons (PROBEAT, Hitachi, full- and half-gantry). Proton beams were delivered to 30 × 30 × 40 cm3 plastic water phantoms. WENDI-II and LUPIN-BF3-NP neutron rem-meters were positioned at three angles (0°, 45°, 90°) relative to the beam direction to measure the neutron H*(10) at distances between 50–300 cm from the isocenter. Main results. H*(10) showed dependence on beam energy, machine type, and measurement location. The highest reading was for the gantry-mounted synchrocyclotron, whereas other systems produced approximately comparable neutron doses. In all cases, the H*(10) reduced with distance from the isocenter. The H*(10) drop at 2 m distance compared to that at 0.5 m was a factor of ∼5 for the gantry-mounted synchrocyclotron whereas in other systems the decrease was a factor of 10. The WENDI-II device suffered from dead-time-associated under-estimation of the dose by a factor of ∼2–3 under the synchrocyclotron beam due to its high dose-per-pulse. However, WENDI-II and LUPIN-BF3-NP results were within reasonable agreement in isochronous cyclotron and synchrotron beams, indicating that both devices are suitable for those systems. Significance. Neutron H*(10) is dependent on various parameters including beam energy, measurement location, as well as machine design. Caution must be exercised in choosing the appropriate neutron-dose-measurement device to be used for low-duty-factor, particularly in high-instantaneous-rate proton delivery systems. By delivering the same volumetric proton dose across different machines, this work provides a benchmark for inter-system comparisons and serves as a foundation for future studies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number235019
JournalPhysics in Medicine and Biology
Volume70
Issue number23
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 7 2025

Keywords

  • LUPIN
  • WENDI
  • cyclotron
  • neutron
  • neutron ambient dose equivalent
  • proton therapy
  • synchrotron

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'First multi-institutional systematic comparison of the neutron ambient dose equivalent produced by proton therapy systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this