Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Forced-Air Warming and Resistive Heating Devices. Updated Perspectives on Safety and Surgical Site Infections

  • Wiebke Ackermann
  • , Qianqian Fan
  • , Akarsh J. Parekh
  • , Nicoleta Stoicea
  • , John Ryan
  • , Sergio D. Bergese
  • Ohio State University
  • Xijing Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: Perioperative hypothermia is one of the most common phenomena seen among surgical patients, leading to numerous adverse outcomes such as intraoperative blood loss, cardiac events, coagulopathy, increased hospital stay and associated costs. Forced air warming (FAW) and resistive heating (RH) are the two most commonly used and widely studied devices to prevent perioperative hypothermia. The effect of FAW on operating room laminar flow and surgical site infection is unclear and we initiated an extensive literature search in order to get a scientific insight of this aspect. Material and Methods: The literature search was conducted using the Medline search engine, PubMed, Cochrane review, google scholar, and OSU library. Results: Out of 92 Articles considered initially for review we selected a total of 73 relevant references. Currently there is no robust evidence to support that FAW can increase SSIs. In addition, both of the two warming devices present safety problems. Conclusion: As unbiased independent reviewers, we advise clinicians to weigh the risks and benefits when using either one of these devices; no change in the current practice is necessary until further data emerges.

Original languageEnglish
Article number64
JournalFrontiers in Surgery
Volume5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 21 2018

Keywords

  • Bair hugger™ patient warming
  • forced air warming
  • Hotdog® patient warming
  • perioperative hypothermia
  • resistive heating
  • surgical site infections

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Forced-Air Warming and Resistive Heating Devices. Updated Perspectives on Safety and Surgical Site Infections'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this