Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Functional Outcomes for Patients With Congenital Anorectal Malformations: A Systematic Review and Evidence-based Guideline From the APSA Outcomes and Evidence Based Practice Committee

  • American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence-Based Practice Committee
  • Baylor College of Medicine
  • University of Washington
  • University of Missouri at Kansas City
  • The Children's Hospital, Aurora
  • Provincial Health Services Authority
  • Drexel University College of Medicine
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Yale New Haven Health System
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore
  • St. Luke's Health System
  • Rush University Medical Center
  • SUNY Buffalo
  • University of Miami
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • Memorial Regional Hospital
  • Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
  • Nationwide Children’s Hospital
  • Mercy Hospital
  • University of South Carolina
  • Virginia Commonwealth University
  • New York University
  • University of Rochester
  • University of Southern California
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: Consensus on functional outcomes for anorectal malformations (ARM) is hindered by the heterogeneity of the available literature. Optimal patient counseling includes discussion of short- and long-term outcomes for bowel and urinary continence, sexual and psychosocial function, transitional care, and quality of life. This systematic review examines and summarizes the current literature available related to functional outcomes for children with ARM. Methods: The American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence Based Practice Committee drafted consensus-based questions regarding anorectal malformations. Pertinent articles from 1985 to 2021 were reviewed. Results: More than 10,843 publications were reviewed with 109 being included in the final recommendations. Recommendations are primarily based on C-D levels of evidence. Continence and constipation rates were higher in patients with perineal fistula and rectovestibular fistula, although symptoms tended to improve as patients got older. Urological anomalies are common and longer term urologic surveillance protocols for patients with ARM need to be further outlined. Sexual and psychosocial issues are common, but ARM patients can have a good quality of life when gastrointestinal symptoms are minimized. Many of the problems associated with ARM can persist into adulthood, supporting structured care plans as patients transition to adult care. Conclusions: Evidence to support best practices and achieve optimal outcomes for patients with ARM is lacking for many aspects of care. Multi-institutional registries have begun to address management and prognosis for these patients. Prospective and comparative studies are needed to improve care and provide consensus guidelines for this complex patient population. Level of evidence: 4.

Original languageEnglish
Article number162243
JournalJournal of Pediatric Surgery
Volume60
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2025

Keywords

  • Anorectal malformation
  • Imperforate anus
  • Outcome
  • Systematic review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Functional Outcomes for Patients With Congenital Anorectal Malformations: A Systematic Review and Evidence-based Guideline From the APSA Outcomes and Evidence Based Practice Committee'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this