Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

GAPS phase II: development and pilot results of the global assessment in pediatric surgery, an evidence-based pediatric surgical capacity assessment tool for low-resource settings

  • Yasmine Yousef
  • , Sarah Cairo
  • , Etienne St-Louis
  • , Laura F. Goodman
  • , Doulia M. Hamad
  • , Robert Baird
  • , Emily R. Smith
  • , Sherif Emil
  • , Jean Martin Laberge
  • , Mohamed Abdelmalak
  • , Zipporah Gathuy
  • , Faye Evans
  • , Maryam Ghavami Adel
  • , Ki K. Bertille
  • , Milind Chitnis
  • , Leecarlo Millano
  • , Peter Nthumba
  • , Sergio d’Agostino
  • , Bruno Cigliano
  • , Luis Zea-Salazar
  • Emmanuel Ameh, Doruk Ozgediz, Elena Guadagno, Dan Poenaru
  • University of California at San Francisco
  • McGill University
  • University of California at Irvine
  • University of British Columbia
  • Duke University
  • Nile of Hope Hospital for Congenital Anomalies
  • Alexandria University
  • The Nairobi Hospital
  • Boston Children's Hospital
  • Tehran University of Medical Sciences
  • Charles de Gaulle Pediatric Academic Hospital
  • Walter Sisulu University
  • Krida Wacana University
  • AIC Kijabe Hospital
  • Surgery for Children
  • Omni Hospital
  • National Hospital Abuja

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Pediatric surgical care in low- and middle-income countries is often hindered by systemic gaps in healthcare resources, infrastructure, training, and organization. This study aims to develop and validate the Global Assessment of Pediatric Surgery (GAPS) to appraise pediatric surgical capacity and discriminate between levels of care across diverse healthcare settings. Methods: The GAPS Version 1 was constructed through a synthesis of existing assessment tools and expert panel consultation. The resultant GAPS Version 2 underwent international pilot testing. Construct validation categorized institutions into providing basic or advanced surgical care. GAPS was further refined to Version 3 to include only questions with a > 75% response rate and those that significantly discriminated between basic or advanced surgical settings. Results: GAPS Version 1 included 139 items, which, after expert panel feedback, was expanded to 168 items in Version 2. Pilot testing, in 65 institutions, yielded a high response rate. Of the 168 questions in GAPS Version 2, 64 significantly discriminated between basic and advanced surgical care. The refined GAPS Version 3 tool comprises 64 questions on: human resources (9), material resources (39), outcomes (3), accessibility (3), and education (10). Conclusion: The GAPS Version 3 tool presents a validated instrument for evaluating pediatric surgical capabilities in low-resource settings.

Original languageEnglish
Article number158
JournalPediatric Surgery International
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2024

Keywords

  • Children’s surgery
  • Global health
  • Global surgery
  • Low-income country
  • Middle-income country
  • Pediatric surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'GAPS phase II: development and pilot results of the global assessment in pediatric surgery, an evidence-based pediatric surgical capacity assessment tool for low-resource settings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this