Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Gastro-Entero-Colic Fistula After Successful EUS Guided Gastroenterostomy: Initial Lessons Learned From an International Cohort

  • Antonio Mendoza Ladd
  • , Michel Ladna
  • , Luke Pecha
  • , Enrique Perez Cuadrado
  • , Kaveh Sharzehi
  • , Meera Bhardwaj
  • , Samuel Han
  • , Jorge Vargas
  • , Sumant Inamdar
  • , Khanh Do-Cong Pham
  • , Olaya Brewer
  • , Christoph Schlag
  • , Pieter Hindryckx
  • , Tomas Hucl
  • , Amrita Sethi
  • , Viliam Masaryk
  • , Harshit Khara
  • University of California at Davis
  • Labex Immuno-Oncology
  • Oregon Health and Science University
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • Caja Costarricense de Seguro Social
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
  • University of Bergen
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • University of Zurich
  • Ghent University
  • Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine
  • Columbia University
  • SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera
  • Geisinger Medical Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is an effective option for the management of gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). Due to the poor prognosis of patients undergoing it, data on its long-term adverse events (AE) is scarce. Herein, we describe a cohort of patients with gastro-entero-colic fistula (GECF) as a late AE of previously successful EUS-GE. Methods: Patients who developed a GECF after EUS-GE from 10 high-volume centers were analyzed. Information collected included demographic characteristics, indications, clinical and technical success rates, stent type and size, fistula characteristics, management, and outcomes. Results: Sixteen cases were identified. The mean interval from index EUS-GE to the diagnosis of GECF was 4 to 8 weeks. The most common cause of GOO was pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The transverse colon was the most common site for the GECF (14 patients). A 20×10 mm lumen apposing metal stent (LAMS) was utilized in 10 patients. Endoscopic management with a variety of modalities was successful in 13 cases. Follow-up interval after endoscopic management of the fistula averaged 2 to 4 weeks. At the time of the manuscript elaboration, 10 patients had died, 5 were alive, and 1 was lost to follow-up. Conclusions: This is the first description of a cohort of patients with GECF after EUS-GE. The exact mechanisms leading to GECF in these cases are unknown. Possible explanations include inadvertent colon puncture during the index procedure and/or entrapment of mesocolon. More data is needed to further characterize this AE.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Clinical Gastroenterology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2025

Keywords

  • EUS guided gastroenterostomy
  • adverse events
  • endoscopic ultrasound
  • gastric outlet obstruction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gastro-Entero-Colic Fistula After Successful EUS Guided Gastroenterostomy: Initial Lessons Learned From an International Cohort'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this