Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Gender, race, and perceived risk: The 'white male' effect

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

875 Scopus citations

Abstract

Risks tend to be judged lower by men than by women and by white people than by people of colour. Prior research by Flynn, Slavic and Mertz [Risk Analysis, 14, pp. 1101-1108] found that these race and gender differences in risk perception in the United States were primarily due to 30% of the white male population who judge risks to be extremely low. The specificity of this finding suggests an explanation in terms of sociopolitical factors rather than biological factors. The study reported here presents new data from a recent national survey conducted in the United States. Although white males again stood apart with respect to their judgements of risk and their attitudes concerning worldviews, trust, and risk-related stigma, the results showed that the distinction between white males and others is more complex than originally thought Further investigation of sociopolitical factors in risk judgements is recommended to clarify gender and racial differences.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)159-172
Number of pages14
JournalHealth, Risk and Society
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2000

Keywords

  • Gender
  • Race
  • Risk perception
  • Trust
  • White male effect

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gender, race, and perceived risk: The 'white male' effect'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this