Abstract
Diverse biological communities mediate the transformation, transport, and storage of elements fundamental to life on Earth, including carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen. However, global biogeochemical model outcomes can vary by orders of magnitude, compromising capacity to project realistic ecosystem responses to planetary changes, including ocean productivity and climate. Here, we compare global carbon turnover rates estimated using models grounded in biological versus geochemical theory and argue that the turnover estimates based on each perspective yield divergent outcomes. Importantly, empirical studies that include sedimentary biological activity vary less than those that ignore it. Improving the relevance of model projections and reducing uncertainty associated with the anticipated consequences of global change requires reconciliation of these perspectives, enabling better societal decisions on mitigation and adaptation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 96-105 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Trends in Ecology and Evolution |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 2018 |
Keywords
- biodiversity
- bioturbation
- carbon
- climate change
- remineralization
- sediments
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Global Carbon Cycling on a Heterogeneous Seafloor'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver