Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Global Surgery Pro–Con Debate: A Pathway to Bilateral Academic Success or the Bold New Face of Colonialism?

  • Alyssa Scheiner
  • , Jennifer L. Rickard
  • , Benedict Nwomeh
  • , Randeep S. Jawa
  • , Enrique Ginzburg
  • , Tamara N. Fitzgerald
  • , Anthony Charles
  • , Abebe Bekele
  • Stony Brook University
  • University of Minnesota Twin Cities
  • Ohio State University
  • University of Miami
  • Duke University
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Addis Ababa University

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

37 Scopus citations

Abstract

Global surgery, especially academic global surgery, is of tremendous interest to many surgeons. Classically, it entails personnel from high-income countries going to low- and middle-income countries and engaging in educational activities as well as procedures. Academic medical personnel have included students, residents, and attendings. The pervasive notion is that this is a win–win situation for the volunteers and the hosts, that is, a pathway to bilateral academic success. However, a critical examination demonstrates that it can easily become the bold new face of colonialism of a low- and middle-income country by a high-income country.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)272-280
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume252
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2020

Keywords

  • Colonialism
  • Education
  • Global surgery
  • Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Global Surgery Pro–Con Debate: A Pathway to Bilateral Academic Success or the Bold New Face of Colonialism?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this