Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Graphical Tools for Conceptualizing Systems Thinking in Chemistry Education

  • Katherine B. Aubrecht
  • , Yehudit Judy Dori
  • , Thomas A. Holme
  • , Rea Lavi
  • , Stephen A. Matlin
  • , Marykay Orgill
  • , Heather Skaza-Acosta
  • Technion-Israel Institute of Technology
  • Iowa State University
  • Imperial College London
  • International Organization for Chemical Sciences in Development
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas
  • Florida Gulf Coast University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

63 Scopus citations

Abstract

One challenge associated with introducing systems thinking in chemistry classrooms is the increase in content complexity that students face when they engage in this type of approach. Placing core chemical ideas within larger systems has promise, as long as students are not overwhelmed by the added complexity. Although there are many potential strategies for dealing with complexity, one common tool is to employ visual or graphical tools to help conceptualize the problem or system at hand. In part because systems thinking touches on many potential levels of implementation, there are different visual tools that are helpful in conceptualizing different aspects. Some tools, such as systems-oriented concept map extension (SOCME) diagrams and systemigrams, use methodologies often associated with concept mapping but add features that enhance their applicability in systems thinking. Object-Process Methodology (OPM), which has seen fairly wide use in systems engineering contexts, uses formally defined components and links between them to help conceptualize systems and problems. Many systems of interest are dynamic in nature so tools such as behavior over time graphs (BOTG) are helpful in calibrating the temporal aspects of systems. Such dynamics are also captured via causal loop diagrams and stock and flow diagrams. Here, we introduce and describe the affordances of multiple types of graphical tools that can be used to support systems thinking approaches in chemistry education. Knowing the uses and advantages of these different tools will allow instructors to make informed choices about the tools that will best meet a particular educational goal when using systems thinking approaches in the classroom.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2888-2900
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Chemical Education
Volume96
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 10 2019

Keywords

  • Curriculum
  • Learning Theories
  • Systems Thinking

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Graphical Tools for Conceptualizing Systems Thinking in Chemistry Education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this