Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Group Comparisons of DSM-IV Subtypes of Chronic Depression: Validity of the Distinctions, Part 2

  • James P. McCullough
  • , Daniel N. Klein
  • , Frances E. Borian
  • , Robert H. Howland
  • , Lawrence P. Riso
  • , Martin B. Keller
  • , Phillip L.C. Banks
  • Virginia Commonwealth University
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Georgia State University
  • Brown University
  • STATPROBE, Inc.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

79 Scopus citations

Abstract

The nosology of chronic depression in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; DSM-IV, American Psychiatric Association, 1994) is highly complex and requires clinicians to differentiate among several chronic course subtypes. This study replicates an earlier investigation (J. McCullough et al., 2000) that found few differences among Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed. rev.; DSM-III-R; American Psychiatric Association, 1987) categories of chronic depression. In the present study, 681 outpatients with chronic major depression, double depression, recurrent major depression without full interepisode recovery, and chronic major depression superimposed on antecedent dysthymia were compared. Few differences were observed on a broad range of demographic, clinical, psychosocial, family history, and treatment response variables. The authors suggest that chronic depression should be viewed as a single, broad condition that can assume a variety of clinical course configurations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)614-622
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Abnormal Psychology
Volume112
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2003

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Group Comparisons of DSM-IV Subtypes of Chronic Depression: Validity of the Distinctions, Part 2'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this