Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Group versus individual exercise interventions for women with breast cancer: A meta-analysis

  • Stony Brook University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

59 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background. Both during and after treatment, cancer survivors experience declines in physical and psychosocial quality of life (QoL). Prior research indicates that exercise interventions alleviate problems in physical functioning and some aspects of psychological functioning. For survivors seeking social support, exercise programmes that are conducted in group settings may foster optimal QoL improvement (by addressing additional issues related to isolation and social support) over individually based exercise programmes. Methods. We reviewed literature on group cohesion in exercise studies, and conducted a meta-analysis to test the hypothesis that group as compared to individual exercise interventions for breast cancer survivors would show greater improvement in QoL. Results. As currently implemented, group exercise interventions showed no advantage. However, they typically did not provide any evidence that they capitalised upon potentially beneficial group processes. Conclusions. Future exercise intervention studies could investigate the effect on QoL of deliberately using group dynamics processes, such as team-building experiences and group goal setting to foster group cohesion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)22-41
Number of pages20
JournalHealth Psychology Review
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Exercise
  • Group dynamics
  • Meta-analysis
  • Oncology
  • Quality of life

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Group versus individual exercise interventions for women with breast cancer: A meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this