Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Guidelines and standards for the study of death and recalled experiences of death––a multidisciplinary consensus statement and proposed future directions

  • Sam Parnia
  • , Stephen G. Post
  • , Matthew T. Lee
  • , Sonja Lyubomirsky
  • , Tom P. Aufderheide
  • , Charles D. Deakin
  • , Bruce Greyson
  • , Jeffrey Long
  • , Anelly M. Gonzales
  • , Elise L. Huppert
  • , Analise Dickinson
  • , Stephan Mayer
  • , Briana Locicero
  • , Jeff Levin
  • , Anthony Bossis
  • , Everett Worthington
  • , Peter Fenwick
  • , Tara Keshavarz Shirazi
  • New York University
  • Harvard University
  • University of California at Riverside
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
  • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Virginia
  • Mary Bird Perkins Terrebonne General Medical Cancer Center
  • New York Medical College
  • Stony Brook University
  • Baylor University
  • Virginia Commonwealth University
  • King's College London

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

50 Scopus citations

Abstract

An inadvertent consequence of advances in stem cell research, neuroscience, and resuscitation science has been to enable scientific insights regarding what happens to the human brain in relation to death. The scientific exploration of death is in large part possible due to the recognition that brain cells are more resilient to the effects of anoxia than assumed. Hence, brain cells become irreversibly damaged and “die” over hours to days postmortem. Resuscitation science has enabled life to be restored to millions of people after their hearts had stopped. These survivors have described a unique set of recollections in relation to death that appear universal. We review the literature, with a focus on death, the recalled experiences in relation to cardiac arrest, post–intensive care syndrome, and related phenomena that provide insights into potential mechanisms, ethical implications, and methodologic considerations for systematic investigation. We also identify issues and controversies related to the study of consciousness and the recalled experience of cardiac arrest and death in subjects who have been in a coma, with a view to standardize and facilitate future research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-21
Number of pages17
JournalAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Volume1511
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2022

Keywords

  • cardiac arrest
  • cardiopulmonary resuscitation–induced consciousness (CPRIC)
  • death
  • death by brain death criteria
  • external visual awareness (EVA)
  • near-death experiences (NDEs)
  • out-of-body experiences (OBEs)
  • post–intensive care syndrome (PICS)
  • recalled experience of death (RED) coma
  • resuscitation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Guidelines and standards for the study of death and recalled experiences of death––a multidisciplinary consensus statement and proposed future directions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this