TY - JOUR
T1 - History of US Presidential Assaults on Modern Environmental Health Protection
AU - Fredrickson, Leif
AU - Sellers, Christopher
AU - Dillon, Lindsey
AU - Ohayon, Jennifer Liss
AU - Shapiro, Nicholas
AU - Sullivan, Marianne
AU - Bocking, Stephen
AU - Brown, Phil
AU - De La Rosa, Vanessa
AU - Harrison, Jill
AU - Johns, Sara
AU - Kulik, Katherine
AU - Lave, Rebecca
AU - Murphy, Michelle
AU - Piper, Liza
AU - Richter, Lauren
AU - Wylie, Sara
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American Public Health Association Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/4
Y1 - 2018/4
N2 - The Trump administration has undertaken an assault on the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), an agency critical to environmental health. This assault has precedents in the administrations of Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush. The early Reagan administration (1981-1983) launched an overt attack on the EPA, combining deregulation with budget and staff cuts, whereas the George W. Bush administration (2001-2008) adopted a subtler approach, undermining science-based policy. The current administration combines both these strategies and operates in a political context more favorable to its designs on the EPA. The Republican Party has shifted right and now controls the executive branch and both chambers of Congress. Wealthy donors, think tanks, and fossil fuel and chemical industries have become more influential in pushing deregulation. Among the public, political polarization has increased, the environment has become a partisan issue, and science and the mainstream media are distrusted. For these reasons, the effects of today's ongoing regulatory delays, rollbacks, and staff cuts may well surpass those of the administrations of Reagan and Bush, whose impacts on environmental health were considerable.
AB - The Trump administration has undertaken an assault on the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), an agency critical to environmental health. This assault has precedents in the administrations of Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush. The early Reagan administration (1981-1983) launched an overt attack on the EPA, combining deregulation with budget and staff cuts, whereas the George W. Bush administration (2001-2008) adopted a subtler approach, undermining science-based policy. The current administration combines both these strategies and operates in a political context more favorable to its designs on the EPA. The Republican Party has shifted right and now controls the executive branch and both chambers of Congress. Wealthy donors, think tanks, and fossil fuel and chemical industries have become more influential in pushing deregulation. Among the public, political polarization has increased, the environment has become a partisan issue, and science and the mainstream media are distrusted. For these reasons, the effects of today's ongoing regulatory delays, rollbacks, and staff cuts may well surpass those of the administrations of Reagan and Bush, whose impacts on environmental health were considerable.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85059760561
U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304396
DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304396
M3 - Article
C2 - 29698097
AN - SCOPUS:85059760561
SN - 0090-0036
VL - 108
SP - S95-S103
JO - American Journal of Public Health
JF - American Journal of Public Health
ER -