TY - GEN
T1 - Human control of leader-based swarms
AU - Walker, Phillip
AU - Amraii, Saman Amirpour
AU - Lewis, Michael
AU - Chakraborty, Nilanjan
AU - Sycara, Katia
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - As swarms are used in increasingly more complex scenarios, further investigation is needed to determine how to give human operators the best tools to properly influence the swarm after deployment. Previous research has focused on relaying influence from the operator to the swarm, either by broadcasting commands to the entire swarm or by influencing the swarm through the teleoperation of a leader. While these methods each have their different applications, there has been a lack of research into how the influence should be propagated through the swarm in leader-based methods. This paper focuses on two simple methods of information propagation-flooding and consensus-and compares the ability of operators to maneuver the swarm to goal points using each, both with and without sensing error. Flooding involves each robot explicitly matching the speed and direction of the leader (or matching the speed and direction of the first neighboring robot that has already done so), and consensus involves each robot matching the average speed and direction of all the neighbors it senses.We discover that the flooding method is significantly more effective, yet the consensus method has some advantages at lower speeds, and in terms of overall connectivity and cohesion of the swarm.
AB - As swarms are used in increasingly more complex scenarios, further investigation is needed to determine how to give human operators the best tools to properly influence the swarm after deployment. Previous research has focused on relaying influence from the operator to the swarm, either by broadcasting commands to the entire swarm or by influencing the swarm through the teleoperation of a leader. While these methods each have their different applications, there has been a lack of research into how the influence should be propagated through the swarm in leader-based methods. This paper focuses on two simple methods of information propagation-flooding and consensus-and compares the ability of operators to maneuver the swarm to goal points using each, both with and without sensing error. Flooding involves each robot explicitly matching the speed and direction of the leader (or matching the speed and direction of the first neighboring robot that has already done so), and consensus involves each robot matching the average speed and direction of all the neighbors it senses.We discover that the flooding method is significantly more effective, yet the consensus method has some advantages at lower speeds, and in terms of overall connectivity and cohesion of the swarm.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84893596751
U2 - 10.1109/SMC.2013.462
DO - 10.1109/SMC.2013.462
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84893596751
SN - 9780769551548
T3 - Proceedings - 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC 2013
SP - 2712
EP - 2717
BT - Proceedings - 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC 2013
T2 - 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC 2013
Y2 - 13 October 2013 through 16 October 2013
ER -