Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Immunotherapy rechallenge after significant toxicity - can it be done successfully?

  • Ashley Tan
  • , Tara McSweeney
  • , Nisha Sikotra
  • , Brendan Adler
  • , Tom van Hagen
  • , Quentin Summers
  • , Andrew Dean
  • , Naomi van Hagen
  • , Ashleigh DeMarie
  • , Eli Gabbay
  • , Timothy D. Clay
  • St John of God Healthcare
  • University of Notre Dame Australia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Aim: We describe a single-center burden of admissions for irAE management and rechallenge feasibility. Methods: A retrospective single-center study of patients receiving immunotherapy between 2015–2018 assessing irAE and immunotherapy rechallenge outcomes. Results: 69 of 307 patients (22%) required 124 hospitalizations for irAEs. 8 required ICU admission (2.6%). 6 (1.9%) died from irAEs. Corticosteroids were used in 96% of admissions. Additional immunosuppression was required in 26 admissions (21%). 47 of 69 patients were rechallenged (68%). The median duration between toxicity and rechallenge was 49 days (range 17–994 days). 19 of 47 rechallenged patients (40%) were admitted for subsequent irAE. 19 patients of the rechallenged group (40%) were alive at last follow-up. Conclusion: Immunotherapy rechallenge following prior irAE hospitalization is feasible but carries significant toxicity risk.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103-111
Number of pages9
JournalImmunotherapy
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2025

Keywords

  • Immunotherapy
  • corticosteroid therapy
  • hospitalisation
  • immune-related adverse events (irAEs)
  • patient outcomes
  • rechallenge
  • safety
  • toxicity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Immunotherapy rechallenge after significant toxicity - can it be done successfully?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this