Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impact of chronic kidney disease in patients undergoing percutaneous or surgical carotid artery revascularization: Insights of the healthcare cost and utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample

  • Fabio V. Lima
  • , Tzyy Yun M. Yen
  • , Javed Butler
  • , Jie Yang
  • , Jianjin Xu
  • , Luis Gruberg
  • Stony Brook University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background/Purpose Carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid artery endarterectomy (CEA) are complementary techniques for management of patients with carotid artery stenosis. This study investigates the impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and age on outcomes after carotid artery revascularization. Methods/Materials National Inpatient Sample was surveyed for CAS and CEA among stage 3 and 4 CKD and stage 5/end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients from 2004 to 2012. Primary endpoint was in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) stratified by kidney function and age. Regression analysis and propensity score matching were utilized. Results There were 3299 patients that underwent CEA and 652 underwent CAS with stage 3 and 4 CKD. Whereas, 1630 patients underwent CEA and 511 patients underwent CAS with stage 5 CKD/ESRD. Patients undergoing CAS had more in-hospital MACCE. Coronary artery disease (OR1.35, 95%CI:1.07–1.70) and CAS (OR1.35, 95%CI:1.02–1.77) were independently associated with MACCE for stage 3 and 4 CKD patients. For the stage 5 CKD/ESRD cohort, CAS (OR1.75, 95%CI:1.29–2.37) was independently associated with MACCE. Stratifying by age, showed no difference in event rates except for higher MACCE among patients <60 years old with stage 5 CKD/ESRD undergoing CAS (p < 0.001). Propensity score matching showed that treatment type had no significant effect on MACCE rates. Conclusions Among CKD cohorts studied nationally, in-hospital MACCE were higher for patients that underwent CAS. Overall, age group analyses showed that there was no difference in MACCE rates between CAS and CEA. Although CAS was independently associated with MACCE, propensity score matching showed no risk difference of MACCE between CAS and CEA for either CKD cohort.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)560-565
Number of pages6
JournalCardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Volume17
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Keywords

  • Carotid artery endarterectomy
  • Carotid artery stenting
  • Chronic kidney disease

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of chronic kidney disease in patients undergoing percutaneous or surgical carotid artery revascularization: Insights of the healthcare cost and utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this