Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators and permanent pacemakers: prevalence and patient outcomes after trauma

  • Stony Brook University
  • Rockefeller University
  • Northwell Health System

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background The prevalence and outcomes of older trauma patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) or permanent pacemakers (PPMs) is unknown. Methods The trauma registry at a regional trauma center was reviewed for blunt trauma patients, aged ≥ 60 years, admitted between 2007 and 2014. Medical records of cardiac devices patients were reviewed. Results Of 4,193 admissions, there were 146 ICD, 233 PPM, and 3,814 no device patients; median Injury Severity Score was 9. Most cardiac device patients had substantial underlying heart disease. Patients with ICDs (13.0%) and PPMs (8.6%) had higher mortality rates than no device patients (5.6%, P =.0002). Among cardiac device patients who died, the device was functioning properly in all that were interrogated; the most common cause of death was intracranial hemorrhage. On propensity score analysis, cardiac devices were not independent predictors of mortality but rather surrogate variables associated with other predictors of mortality. Conclusions Approximately 9.0% of admitted older patients had cardiac devices. Their presence identified patients who had higher mortality rates, likely because of their underlying comorbidities, including cardiac dysfunction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)953-960
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume212
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

Keywords

  • ICD
  • Implantable cardiac device
  • Pacemaker
  • Trauma

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Implantable cardioverter defibrillators and permanent pacemakers: prevalence and patient outcomes after trauma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this