Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Important Considerations for Research on Intimate Partner Violence-Related Brain Injury from the ENIGMA Consortium IPV Working Group

  • Tricia L. Merkley
  • , Hannah M. Lindsey
  • , Emily L. Dennis
  • , Brenda Eagan-Johnson
  • , Brenda Bartnik-Olson
  • , Michael Ellis
  • , Julianna M. Nemeth
  • , Maheen M. Adamson
  • , Esther R. Bennett
  • , Erin D. Bigler
  • , Abby Bowman
  • , Karen Caeyenberghs
  • , Kathy S. Chiou
  • , Nicola L. de Souza
  • , Aeriel G. Halstead
  • , Cooper B. Hodges
  • , Andrei Irimia
  • , Inga K. Koerte
  • , Kathryn Laughon
  • , Alexander P. Lin
  • Amy D. Marshall, Deleene S. Menefee, Kathleen Monahan, Mary R. Newsome, Jessica Salley Riccardi, Philine Rojczyk, Sally Rothemeyer, Dan J. Stein, Erin Sullivan-Baca, Leah D. Talbert, David F. Tate, Paul van Donkelaar, Samara L. Lipsky, Elisabeth A. Wilde, Carrie Esopenko
  • Brigham Young University
  • University of Utah
  • BrainSTEPS Brain Injury School Consulting Program in Pennsylvania
  • Loma Linda University Health
  • University of Manitoba
  • Ohio State University
  • Stanford University
  • Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick
  • Deakin University
  • University of Nebraska-Lincoln
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • Andrews University
  • University of Southern California
  • Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
  • Harvard University
  • University of Virginia
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • Department of Veterans Affairs
  • The Menninger Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences
  • South Central Mental Illness Research and Clinical Care Center (MIRECC)
  • Baylor College of Medicine
  • VA Medical Center
  • University of Maine
  • University of Cape Town
  • DR Associates of North Texas
  • University of British Columbia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Women exposed to intimate partner violence (IPV) may experience head, neck, and facial trauma, increasing their risk for concomitant brain injury (BI). The study of IPV-BI poses unique challenges due to safety, demographic, biological, and social factors, requiring considerations beyond the commonly used methods employed in BI research. Thus, this special article examines research considerations unique to IPV-BI research to enable future robust investigation. Method: Members of the ENIGMA IPV Working Group (WG), encompassing a multidisciplinary team of researchers, clinicians, community partners, and advocates, described methodological considerations and challenges they encounter in IPV-BI research studies and clinical practice. Results: Key points identified as important research challenges/considerations include: 1) lifetime exposure to single versus repetitive head trauma; 2) biological and social determinants of health; 3) premorbid/comorbid physical and psychological health conditions; and 4) consideration of specific comparison groups. Conclusions: As studies are urgently needed to examine many aspects of IPV-BI, addressing the research challenges in a rigorous way will enable robust examination of the cognitive, psychological, and neurological correlates of IPV-BI, which can in turn, better inform prevention and treatment strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1205-1220
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Family Violence
Volume41
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2026

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Brain Injury
  • Intimate Partner Violence
  • Methods
  • Non-Fatal Strangulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Important Considerations for Research on Intimate Partner Violence-Related Brain Injury from the ENIGMA Consortium IPV Working Group'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this