TY - JOUR
T1 - Improved calibration of rf cavities for relativistic electron beams
T2 - Effects of secondary corrections and experimental verification
AU - Shih, K.
AU - Petrushina, I.
AU - Litvinenko, V. N.
AU - Pinayev, I.
AU - Ma, J.
AU - Wang, G.
AU - Jing, Y.
AU - Wu, Y.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 authors. Published by the American Physical Society. Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - In the aspect of longitudinal beam bunching, the bunching strength can be controlled by the rf cavity phase and voltage. However, these machine parameters are different from those that interact with the beam itself. In order to gain control of the beam-cavity interaction, cavity calibration must be performed. Furthermore, it relies on fitting the beam energy gain versus cavity phase to a calibration function. Under the conventional assumption of relativistic beam conditions, the calibration function is a first harmonic sinusoidal function (a sinusoidal function with a period of 2π). However, this expression is insufficient for a high-voltage bunching cavity. Due to beam acceleration inside the cavity, an energy bias and a second harmonic function should be included to modify the conventional calibration function, even for a relativistic electron beam. In this paper, we will derive this modification and provide a comparison to both the Coherent Electron Cooling Experiment and the impact-t simulation, respectively.
AB - In the aspect of longitudinal beam bunching, the bunching strength can be controlled by the rf cavity phase and voltage. However, these machine parameters are different from those that interact with the beam itself. In order to gain control of the beam-cavity interaction, cavity calibration must be performed. Furthermore, it relies on fitting the beam energy gain versus cavity phase to a calibration function. Under the conventional assumption of relativistic beam conditions, the calibration function is a first harmonic sinusoidal function (a sinusoidal function with a period of 2π). However, this expression is insufficient for a high-voltage bunching cavity. Due to beam acceleration inside the cavity, an energy bias and a second harmonic function should be included to modify the conventional calibration function, even for a relativistic electron beam. In this paper, we will derive this modification and provide a comparison to both the Coherent Electron Cooling Experiment and the impact-t simulation, respectively.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85163875860
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.26.064201
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.26.064201
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85163875860
SN - 2469-9888
VL - 26
JO - Physical Review Accelerators and Beams
JF - Physical Review Accelerators and Beams
IS - 6
M1 - 064201
ER -