Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

In-home coal and wood use and lung cancer risk: A pooled analysis of the international lung cancer consortium

  • H. Dean Hosgood
  • , Paolo Boffetta
  • , Sander Greenland
  • , Yuan Chin Amy Lee
  • , John Mclaughlin
  • , Adeline Seow
  • , Eric J. Duell
  • , Angeline S. Andrew
  • , David Zaridze
  • , Neonila Szeszenia-Dabrowska
  • , Peter Rudnai
  • , Jolanta Lissowska
  • , Eleonóra Fabiánová
  • , Dana Mates
  • , Vladimir Bencko
  • , Lenka Foretova
  • , Vladimir Janout
  • , Hal Morgenstern
  • , Nathaniel Rothman
  • , Rayjean J. Hung
  • Paul Brennan, Qing Lan
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • University of Toronto
  • National University of Singapore
  • Institute Catala Oncologia
  • Dartmouth College
  • Cancer Research Center
  • Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine
  • Hungarian National Institute of Environmental Health
  • Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute of Oncology
  • State Health Institute
  • Public Health, Health Services Management
  • Charles University
  • Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute
  • Palacký University Olomouc
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • International Agency for Research on Cancer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

132 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Domestic fuel combustion from cooking and heating is an important public health issue because roughly 3 billion people are exposed worldwide. Recently, the International Agency for Research on Cancer classifed indoor emissions from household coal combustion as a human carcinogen (group 1) and from biomass fuel (primarily wood) as a probable human carcinogen (group 2A). oB je c t iv e s: We pooled seven studies from the International Lung Cancer Consortium (5,105 cases and 6,535 controls) to provide further epidemiological evaluation of the association between in-home solid-fuel use, particularly wood, and lung cancer risk. Methods: Using questionnaire data, we classifed subjects as predominant solid-fuel users (e.g., coal, wood) or nonsolid-fuel users (e.g., oil, gas, electricity). Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and to compute 95% confdence intervals (CIs), adjusting for age, sex, education, smoking status, race/ethnicity, and study center. results: Compared with nonsolid-fuel users, predominant coal users (OR = 1.64; 95% CI, 1.49-1.81), particularly coal users in Asia (OR = 4.93; 95% CI, 3.73-6.52), and predominant wood users in North American and European countries (OR = 1.21; 95% CI, 1.06-1.38) experienced higher risk of lung cancer. Te results were similar in never-smoking women and other subgroups. conclusions: Our results are consistent with previous observations pertaining to in-home coal use and lung cancer risk, support the hypothesis of a carcinogenic potential of in-home wood use, and point to the need for more detailed study of factors afecting these associations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1743-1747
Number of pages5
JournalEnvironmental Health Perspectives
Volume118
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2010

Keywords

  • Coal
  • Lung cancer
  • Pooled
  • Risk factor
  • Wood

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'In-home coal and wood use and lung cancer risk: A pooled analysis of the international lung cancer consortium'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this