TY - GEN
T1 - Incentive Design for Lowest Cost Aggregate Energy Demand Reduction
AU - Ghosh, Soumyadip
AU - Kalagnanam, Jayant
AU - Katz, Dmitriy
AU - Squillante, Mark
AU - Zhang, Xiaoxuan
AU - Feinberg, Eugene
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©2010 IEEE.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - We design an optimal incentive mechanism offered to energy customers at multiple network levels, e.g., distribution and feeder networks, with the aim of determining the lowest-cost aggregate energy demand reduction. Our model minimizes a utility’s total cost for this mode of virtual demand generation, i.e., demand reduction, to achieve improvements in both total systemic costs and load reduction over existing mechanisms. We assume the utility can predict with reasonable accuracy the average load reduction response of end-users with respect to rebates by observing and learning from their past behavior. Within a single period formulation, we propose a heuristic policy that segments the customers according to their likelihood of reducing load. Within a multi-period formulation, we observe that customers who are more willing to reduce their aggregate demand over the entire horizon, rather than simply shifting their load to off-peak periods, tend to receive higher incentives, and vice versa.
AB - We design an optimal incentive mechanism offered to energy customers at multiple network levels, e.g., distribution and feeder networks, with the aim of determining the lowest-cost aggregate energy demand reduction. Our model minimizes a utility’s total cost for this mode of virtual demand generation, i.e., demand reduction, to achieve improvements in both total systemic costs and load reduction over existing mechanisms. We assume the utility can predict with reasonable accuracy the average load reduction response of end-users with respect to rebates by observing and learning from their past behavior. Within a single period formulation, we propose a heuristic policy that segments the customers according to their likelihood of reducing load. Within a multi-period formulation, we observe that customers who are more willing to reduce their aggregate demand over the entire horizon, rather than simply shifting their load to off-peak periods, tend to receive higher incentives, and vice versa.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105021008222
U2 - 10.1109/SMARTGRID.2010.5622095
DO - 10.1109/SMARTGRID.2010.5622095
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105021008222
SN - 9781424465125
T3 - 2010 1st IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications, SmartGridComm 2010
SP - 519
EP - 524
BT - 2010 1st IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications, SmartGridComm 2010
PB - IEEE Computer Society
T2 - 1st IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications, SmartGridComm 2010
Y2 - 4 October 2010 through 6 October 2010
ER -