TY - JOUR
T1 - Incidence and Clinical Relevance of Echocardiographic Visualization of Occult Ventricular Fibrillation
T2 - A Multicenter Prospective Study of Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
AU - Gaspari, Romolo
AU - Lindsay, Robert
AU - She, Trent
AU - Acuna, Josie
AU - Balk, Andrew
AU - Bartnik, Jakub
AU - Baxter, Jacob
AU - Clare, Drew
AU - Caplan, Richard J.
AU - DeAngelis, John
AU - Filler, Levi
AU - Graham, Powell
AU - Hill, Mike
AU - Hipskind, John
AU - Joseph, Ryan
AU - Kapoor, Monica
AU - Kummer, Tobi
AU - Lewis, Margaret
AU - Midgley, Stephanie
AU - Nalbandian, Ari
AU - Narveas-Guerra, Offdan
AU - Nomura, Jason
AU - Sanjeevan, Irina
AU - Scheatzle, Mark
AU - Schnittke, Nikolai
AU - Secko, Michael
AU - Soucy, Zachary
AU - Stowell, Jeffrey R.
AU - Theophanous, Rebecca G.
AU - Tozer, Jordan
AU - Yates, Tyler
AU - Gleeson, Timothy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 American College of Emergency Physicians
PY - 2025/10
Y1 - 2025/10
N2 - Study objectives: Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is traditionally identified on ECG but echocardiography can visualize myocardial fibrillation. The prevalence and importance of occult VF defined as a nonshockable ECG rhythm but VF by echocardiography is unknown. Methods: In this multicenter, prospective study, emergency department patients presenting following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were eligible for inclusion if echocardiography and ECG were performed simultaneously. Recorded echocardiography and ECG were interpreted separately by physicians blinded to all patient and resuscitation information. The primary outcome was percentage of occult VF. The secondary outcomes included survival to hospital discharge, termination of defibrillated VF, and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Termination of VF is described as a postdefibrillation change in ECG rhythm to a nonshockable rhythm. Multivariate modeling accounted for confounding variables. Results: Of 811 patients enrolled, 5.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.9 to 7.1) demonstrated occult VF. An additional 24.9% (95% CI 22.1 to 28.0) demonstrated ECG VF. Of the patients with occult VF, 81.4% demonstrated ECG pulseless electrical activity (PEA) and 18.6% demonstrated ECG asystole. Occult VF was less likely to be defibrillated compared with ECG VF. Defibrillation was not significantly more likely to terminate occult VF (75.0% vs 55.6%; odds ratio [OR], 2.3; 95% CI 0.42 to 15.24). ROSC was not statistically different for occult VF compared with ECG VF (39.5% vs 24.8%; OR, 2.26; 95% CI 0.87 to 5.9). Survival to hospital discharge was no different for patients with occult VF compared with ECG VF (7.0% vs 5.4%; OR, 3.6; 95% CI 0.63 to 19.2) despite fewer defibrillation attempts for patients with occult VF. Conclusion: Occult VF was seen in 5.3% of patients following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Recognizing and treating occult VF who otherwise would have been treated as PEA or asystole led to survival outcomes indistinguishable to traditionally recognized VF.
AB - Study objectives: Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is traditionally identified on ECG but echocardiography can visualize myocardial fibrillation. The prevalence and importance of occult VF defined as a nonshockable ECG rhythm but VF by echocardiography is unknown. Methods: In this multicenter, prospective study, emergency department patients presenting following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were eligible for inclusion if echocardiography and ECG were performed simultaneously. Recorded echocardiography and ECG were interpreted separately by physicians blinded to all patient and resuscitation information. The primary outcome was percentage of occult VF. The secondary outcomes included survival to hospital discharge, termination of defibrillated VF, and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Termination of VF is described as a postdefibrillation change in ECG rhythm to a nonshockable rhythm. Multivariate modeling accounted for confounding variables. Results: Of 811 patients enrolled, 5.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.9 to 7.1) demonstrated occult VF. An additional 24.9% (95% CI 22.1 to 28.0) demonstrated ECG VF. Of the patients with occult VF, 81.4% demonstrated ECG pulseless electrical activity (PEA) and 18.6% demonstrated ECG asystole. Occult VF was less likely to be defibrillated compared with ECG VF. Defibrillation was not significantly more likely to terminate occult VF (75.0% vs 55.6%; odds ratio [OR], 2.3; 95% CI 0.42 to 15.24). ROSC was not statistically different for occult VF compared with ECG VF (39.5% vs 24.8%; OR, 2.26; 95% CI 0.87 to 5.9). Survival to hospital discharge was no different for patients with occult VF compared with ECG VF (7.0% vs 5.4%; OR, 3.6; 95% CI 0.63 to 19.2) despite fewer defibrillation attempts for patients with occult VF. Conclusion: Occult VF was seen in 5.3% of patients following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Recognizing and treating occult VF who otherwise would have been treated as PEA or asystole led to survival outcomes indistinguishable to traditionally recognized VF.
KW - Cardiac arrest
KW - ECG
KW - Echocardiography
KW - Electrocardiography
KW - Ventricular fibrillation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105009515399
U2 - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.04.014
DO - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.04.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 40590825
AN - SCOPUS:105009515399
SN - 0196-0644
VL - 86
SP - 328
EP - 336
JO - Annals of Emergency Medicine
JF - Annals of Emergency Medicine
IS - 4
ER -