TY - GEN
T1 - Incrementally learning a dependency parser to support language documentation in field linguistics
AU - Ulinski, Morgan
AU - Hirschberg, Julia
AU - Rambow, Owen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 1963-2018 ACL.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - We present experiments in incrementally learning a dependency parser. The parser will be used in the WordsEye Linguistics Tools (WELL) (Ulinski et al., 2014a; Ulinski et al., 2014b) which supports field linguists documenting a language's syntax and semantics. Our goal is to make syntactic annotation faster for field linguists. We have created a new parallel corpus of descriptions of spatial relations and motion events, based on pictures and video clips used by field linguists for elicitation of language from native speaker informants. We collected descriptions for each picture and video from native speakers in English, Spanish, German, and Egyptian Arabic. We compare the performance of MSLParser (McDonald et al., 2006) and MaltParser (Nivre et al., 2006) when trained on small amounts of this data. We find that MaltParser achieves the best performance. We also present the results of experiments using the parser to assist with annotation. We find that even when the parser is trained on a single sentence from the corpus, annotation time significantly decreases.
AB - We present experiments in incrementally learning a dependency parser. The parser will be used in the WordsEye Linguistics Tools (WELL) (Ulinski et al., 2014a; Ulinski et al., 2014b) which supports field linguists documenting a language's syntax and semantics. Our goal is to make syntactic annotation faster for field linguists. We have created a new parallel corpus of descriptions of spatial relations and motion events, based on pictures and video clips used by field linguists for elicitation of language from native speaker informants. We collected descriptions for each picture and video from native speakers in English, Spanish, German, and Egyptian Arabic. We compare the performance of MSLParser (McDonald et al., 2006) and MaltParser (Nivre et al., 2006) when trained on small amounts of this data. We find that MaltParser achieves the best performance. We also present the results of experiments using the parser to assist with annotation. We find that even when the parser is trained on a single sentence from the corpus, annotation time significantly decreases.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85054989722
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85054989722
SN - 9784879747020
T3 - COLING 2016 - 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of COLING 2016: Technical Papers
SP - 440
EP - 449
BT - COLING 2016 - 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of COLING 2016
PB - Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL Anthology
T2 - 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING 2016
Y2 - 11 December 2016 through 16 December 2016
ER -