Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Index selection for OLAP

  • Stanford University

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

331 Scopus citations

Abstract

On-line analytical processing (OLAP) is a recent and important application of database systems. Typically, OLAP data is presented as a multidimensional `data cube.' OLAP queries are complex and can take many hours or even days to run, if executed directly on the raw data. The most common method of reducing execution time is to precompute some of the queries into summary tables (subcubes of the data cube) and then to build indexes on these summary tables. In most commercial OLAP systems today, the summary tables that are to be precomputed are picked first, followed by the selection of the appropriate indexes on them. A trial-and-error approach is used to divide the space available between the summary tables and the indexes. This two-step process can perform very poorly. Since both summary tables and indexes consume the same resource - space - their selection should be done together for the most efficient use of space. In this paper, we give algorithms that automate the selection of summary tables and indexes. In particular, we present a family of algorithms of increasing time complexities, and prove strong performance bounds for them. The algorithms with higher complexities have better performance bounds. However, the increase in the performance bound is diminishing, and we show that an algorithm of moderate complexity can perform fairly close to the optimal.

Original languageEnglish
Pages208-219
Number of pages12
StatePublished - 1997
EventProceedings of the 1997 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Engineering, ICDE - Birmingham, UK
Duration: Apr 7 1997Apr 11 1997

Conference

ConferenceProceedings of the 1997 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Engineering, ICDE
CityBirmingham, UK
Period04/7/9704/11/97

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Index selection for OLAP'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this