Abstract
Community practice and actionable science share a commitment to solving complex problems to promote sustainability. Collective abilities to address these types of problems rely on interdisciplinary collaborations that also offer unique challenges. In this case study of a statewide interdisciplinary setting, we focus on key methodological differences related to problem identification, stakeholder involvement, competing research paradigms, and orientations towards communication. We argue the generative potential in interdisciplinarity is enhanced through sustained effort and attention to difference; acceptance of the ethical responsibility to reflect critically on power in shared decision making spaces; and strategic interventions to continually promote and improve learning.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 189-209 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Journal of Community Practice |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 1-2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 2014 |
Keywords
- case study
- collaboration
- community practice
- interdisciplinarity
- sustainability science
- university-community partnerships
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Interdisciplinarity and Actionable Science: Exploring the Generative Potential in Difference'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver