Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Interobserver variability of R.E.N.A.L., PADUA, and centrality index nephrometry score systems

  • Massimiliano Spaliviero
  • , Bing Ying Poon
  • , Omer Aras
  • , Pier Luigi Di Paolo
  • , Giuliano B. Guglielmetti
  • , Christian Z. Coleman
  • , Christoph A. Karlo
  • , Melanie L. Bernstein
  • , Daniel D. Sjoberg
  • , Paul Russo
  • , Karim A. Touijer
  • , Oguz Akin
  • , Jonathan A. Coleman
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

54 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To assess interobserver variability of R.E.N.A.L., preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical classification system (PADUA), and centrality index (C-Index) systems among observers with varying degrees of clinical experience and each system’s subscale correlation with surgical outcome metrics. Methods: Computed tomography images of 90 patients who underwent open, laparoscopic, or robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy were scored by one radiology fellow, two urology fellows, one radiology resident, and one secondary school student. Agreement among readers was determined calculating intraclass correlation coefficients. Associations between radiology fellow scores (reference standard as reader with greatest clinical experience), ischemia time, and percent change in postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were evaluated using Spearman’s correlation. Results: Agreement using C-Index method (ICC = 0.773) was higher than with PADUA (ICC = 0.677) or R.E.N.A.L (ICC = 0.660). Agreement between reference and secondary school student was lower than with other physicians, although the differences were not statistically significant. The reference’s scores were significantly (p < 0.05) associated with ischemia time on all three scoring systems and with percent change in eGFR at 6 weeks using C-Index (p = 0.016). Tumor size, nearness to sinus, and location relative to polar lines (R.E.N.A.L.) and tumor size, renal sinus involvement, and collecting system involvement (PADUA) correlated with ischemia time (all p ≤ 0.001). No R.E.N.A.L. or PADUA subscales significantly correlated with percent change in postoperative eGFR. Conclusions: Clinical experience reduces interobserver variability of existing nephrometry systems though not significantly and less so when using directly measureable anatomic variables. Consistently, only measures of tumor size and distance to intrarenal structures were useful in predicting clinically relevant outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)853-858
Number of pages6
JournalWorld Journal of Urology
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 22 2015

Keywords

  • Kidney neoplasms
  • Nephrometry
  • Observer variability
  • Outcome assessment
  • Partial nephrectomy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interobserver variability of R.E.N.A.L., PADUA, and centrality index nephrometry score systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this