Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Intuitive Politics and Why Thinking Isn’t Guaranteed to Save Us

  • Sciences Po

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

For many people, politics is like sports. Our intuition is to root for our team, even when the players behave poorly. From antiquity to the Enlightenment, philosophers have proposed thought as the best way to govern messy human impulses. Recent research, however, shows that intuitions play a powerful role in political decision-making, and people often use thinking as a way to rationalize their comfortable but counterproductive gut feelings. In this chapter, the authors explain how this human tendency produces undesirable dynamics in modern electoral democracies. The authors then discuss the conditions under which people can use thinking to be more reflective and what implications it has for democracy. They conclude by considering whether the design of democratic institutions can minimize the negative side effects of intuitive politics.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Politics of Truth in Polarized America
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages398-416
Number of pages19
ISBN (Electronic)9780197578414
ISBN (Print)9780197578384
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2022

Keywords

  • Democratic accountability
  • Intuition
  • Partisan polarization
  • Rationality
  • Reflection

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intuitive Politics and Why Thinking Isn’t Guaranteed to Save Us'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this