Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Investor sentiment and audit opinion shopping

  • Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, Camden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine whether investor sentiment influences clients’ propensity to engage in audit opinion shopping. Using the opinion shopping framework of Lennox (2000), we document that internal control opinion shopping is more prevalent when investor sentiment is high. This effect is concentrated among firms with low institutional ownership. We also find that clients are more likely to undertake downward switches (i.e., Big 4 to non-Big 4 auditor) when sentiment is high. Additional tests reveal that clients who engage in opinion shopping during high sentiment periods have a higher risk of material restatements and higher audit fees. As well, the market-penalty associated with opinion shopping is reduced when sentiment is high. Overall, the results suggest that firms’ opinion shopping behavior during high sentiment periods is more prevalent and opportunistic.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-26
Number of pages26
JournalAuditing
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2021

Keywords

  • Audit opinion
  • Auditor switch
  • Internal control material weakness
  • Lennox (2000) model
  • Opinion shopping

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Investor sentiment and audit opinion shopping'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this