Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Is an electric field always a promoter of wetting? Electro-dewetting of metals by electrolytes probed by: In situ X-ray nanotomography

  • Clemson University
  • Brookhaven National Laboratory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

We developed a special electrochemical cell enabling quantitative analysis and in situ X-ray nanotomography of metal/electrolyte interfaces subject to corrosion. Using this cell and applying the nodoid model to describe menisci formed on tungsten wires during anodization, the evolution of the electrolyte surface tension, the concentration of reaction products, and the meniscus contact angle were studied. In contrast to the electrowetting effect, where the applied electric field decreases the contact angle of electrolytes, anodization of the tungsten wires increases the contact angle of the meniscus. Hence, an electric field favors dewetting rather than wetting of the newly formed surface. The discovered effect opens up new opportunities for the control of wetting phenomena and calls for the revision of existing theories of electrowetting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)101-114
Number of pages14
JournalFaraday Discussions
Volume199
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is an electric field always a promoter of wetting? Electro-dewetting of metals by electrolytes probed by: In situ X-ray nanotomography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this