Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Local versus average structure: A study of neighborite (NaMgF3) utilizing the pair distribution function method for structure determination

  • Stony Brook University
  • United States Department of Energy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

The temperature-dependent local structure (< 2 nm) of neighborite (NaMgF3) is probed through least-squares refinement of structure models fit to the pair distribution function [G(r)] derived from the total high-energy X-ray scattering of sample powders. In contrast to previous temperature-dependent structure models obtained through Rietveld refinement and statistical modelling of powder diffraction data, it is found that the average Mg - F bond length, corresponding to a ∼2 Å peak in the G(r), increases between 323 and 1123 K. At each temperature, asymmetry in this peak is consistent with an orthorhombic (Pbnm) perovskite local structure, allowing three unique Mg - F values and deformation of MgF6 octahedra. Defined by the three orthogonal Mg - Mg distances, the pseudo-cubic unit cell of local structure models becomes metrically tetragonal and cubic at temperatures greater than ∼623 and 1038 K, respectively. A discontinuity in the temperature dependence of the fluorine atomic displacement parameters at 1038 K suggests thermal activation of new vibrational modes in NaMgF3 at high temperature, consistent with transverse vibration of the bridging fluorine atoms (Mg - F - Mg).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)441-448
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Applied Crystallography
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 15 2007

Keywords

  • CaSiO
  • Lower mantle
  • MgSiO
  • NaMgF
  • Pair distribution function
  • Perovskite
  • Phase transition
  • Thermal motion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Local versus average structure: A study of neighborite (NaMgF3) utilizing the pair distribution function method for structure determination'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this