Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Locality and the complexity of minimalist derivation tree languages

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Minimalist grammars provide a formalization of Minimalist syntax which allows us to study how the components of said theory affect its expressivity. A central concern of Minimalist syntax is the locality of the displacement operation Move. In Minimalist grammars, however, Move is unbounded. This paper is a study of the repercussions of limiting movement with respect to the number of slices a moved constituent is allowed to cross, where a slice is the derivation tree equivalent of the phrase projected by a lexical item in the derived tree. I show that this locality condition 1) has no effect on weak generative capacity 2) has no effect on a Minimalist derivation tree language's recognizability by top-down automata 3) renders Minimalist derivation tree languages strictly locally testable, whereas their unrestricted counterparts aren't even locally threshold testable.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationFormal Grammar - 16th International Conference, FG 2011, Revised Selected Papers
Pages208-227
Number of pages20
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012
Event16th International Conference on Formal Grammar, FG 2011 - Ljubljana, Slovenia
Duration: Aug 6 2011Aug 7 2011

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume7395 LNCS
ISSN (Print)0302-9743
ISSN (Electronic)1611-3349

Conference

Conference16th International Conference on Formal Grammar, FG 2011
Country/TerritorySlovenia
CityLjubljana
Period08/6/1108/7/11

Keywords

  • first-order logic
  • locality
  • Minimalist grammars
  • subregular tree languages
  • top-down tree automata

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Locality and the complexity of minimalist derivation tree languages'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this