Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Measurement and mental health disparities: Psychopathology classification and identity assessment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Mental health disparities research compares groups of individuals with regard to their mental health status, and numerous studies have reported significant and burdensome disparities across populations. This literature is based almost entirely on traditional mental disorder constructs (e.g. major depressive disorder and borderline personality disorder) as defined by official nosologies, but these disorders are associated with numerous problems of reliability and validity. Advances in psychopathology classification research have converged on an alternative conceptualization of mental disorder structure, which comprises a set of transdiagnostic dimensions that cut across traditional diagnostic boundaries and overcome the limitations of traditional diagnoses. The application of these dimensions, particularly those of the hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology model, holds great promise for mental health disparities research. Measurement considerations associated with these transdiagnostic dimensions, as well as participants' intersecting identities, are discussed. Incorporation of these measurement advances with statistical advances allows for the generation and testing of unique hypotheses related to minority stressors that may give rise to observed disparities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)76-87
Number of pages12
JournalPersonality and Mental Health
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measurement and mental health disparities: Psychopathology classification and identity assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this