Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Measurement and reliability of response inhibition

  • Eliza Congdon
  • , Jeanette A. Mumford
  • , Jessica R. Cohen
  • , Adriana Galvan
  • , Turhan Canli
  • , Russell A. Poldrack
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • University of Texas at Austin
  • University of California at Berkeley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

253 Scopus citations

Abstract

Response inhibition plays a critical role in adaptive functioning and can be assessed with the Stop-signal task, which requires participants to suppress prepotent motor responses. Evidence suggests that this ability to inhibit a prepotent motor response (reflected as Stop-signal reaction time (SSRT)) is a quantitative and heritable measure of interindividual variation in brain function. Although attention has been given to the optimal method of SSRT estimation, and initial evidence exists in support of its reliability, there is still vari- ability in how Stop-signal task data are treated across samples. In order to examine this issue, we pooled data across three separate studies and examined the influence of multi- ple SSRT calculation methods and outlier calling on reliability (using Intra-class correlation). Our results suggest that an approach which uses the average of all available sessions, all trials of each session, and excludes outliers based on predetermined lenient criteria yields reliable SSRT estimates, while not excluding too many participants. Our findings further support the reliability of SSRT, which is commonly used as an index of inhibitory control, and provide support for its continued use as a neurocognitive phenotype.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberArticle 37
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume3
Issue numberFEB
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Keywords

  • Reliability
  • Response inhibition
  • Stop-signal reaction time

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measurement and reliability of response inhibition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this