Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Measuring trends in extinction risk: a review of two decades of development and application of the Red List Index

  • Stuart H.M. Butchart
  • , H. Resit Akçakaya
  • , Alex J. Berryman
  • , Thomas M. Brooks
  • , Ian J. Burfield
  • , Janice Chanson
  • , Maria P. Dias
  • , John S. Donaldson
  • , Claudia Hermes
  • , Craig Hilton-Taylor
  • , Mike Hoffmann
  • , Jennifer A. Luedtke
  • , Rob Martin
  • , Amy McDougall
  • , Kelsey Neam
  • , Beth Polidoro
  • , Domitilla Raimondo
  • , Ana S.L. Rodrigues
  • , Carlo Rondinini
  • , Claire Rutherford
  • Tom Scott, Ashley T. Simkins, Simon N. Stuart, Jemma Vine
  • BirdLife International
  • University of Cambridge
  • International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources
  • Re:wild
  • University of Lisbon
  • University of Pretoria
  • South African National Biodiversity Institute
  • International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List Unit
  • Zoological Society of London Institute of Zoology
  • Arizona State University
  • Université de Montpellier
  • University of Rome La Sapienza
  • Synchronicity Earth
  • A Rocha International

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Red List Index (RLI) is an indicator of the average extinction risk of groups of species and reflects trends in this through time. It is calculated from the number of species in each category on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, with trends influenced by the number moving between categories when reassessed owing to genuine improvement or deterioration in status. The global RLI is aggregated across multiple taxonomic groups and can be disaggregated to show trends for subsets of species (e.g. migratory species), or driven by particular factors (e.g. international trade). National RLIs have been generated through either repeated assessments of national extinction risk in each country or through disaggregating the global index and weighting each species by the proportion of its range in each country. The RLI has achieved wide policy uptake, including by the Convention on Biological Diversity and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Future priorities include expanding its taxonomic coverage, applying the RLI to the goals and targets of the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, incorporating uncertainty in the underlying Red List assessments, integrating into national RLIs the impact of a country on species’ extinction risk abroad, and improving analysis of the factors driving trends. This article is part of the discussion theme issue ‘Bending the curve towards nature recovery: building on Georgina Mace's legacy for a biodiverse future’.

Original languageEnglish
Article number20230206
JournalPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Volume380
Issue number1917
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 9 2025

Keywords

  • IUCN Red List
  • biodiversity conservation
  • extinction risk
  • indicator
  • multilateral environmental agreement

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring trends in extinction risk: a review of two decades of development and application of the Red List Index'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this