Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Microevolutionary variation in molar morphology of Onychomys leucogaster decoupled from genetic structure

  • University of Florida

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

In neutral models of quantitative trait evolution, both genetic and phenotypic divergence scale as random walks, producing a correlation between the two measures. However, complexity in the genotype-phenotype map may alter the correlation between genotypic and phenotypic divergence, even when both are evolving neutrally or nearly so. Understanding this correlation between phenotypic and genetic variation is critical for accurately interpreting the fossil record. This study compares the geographic structure and scaling of morphological variation of the shape of the first lower molar of 77 individuals of the northern grasshopper mouse Onychomys leucogaster to genome-wide SNP variation in the same sample. We found strong genetic structure but weak or absent morphological structure indicating that the scaling of each type of variation is decoupled from one another. Low PST values relative to FST values are consistent with a lack of morphological divergence in contrast to genetic divergence between groups. This lack of phenotypic structure and the presence of notable within-sample phenotypic variance are consistent with uniform selection or constraints on molar shape across a wide geographic and environmental range. Over time, this kind of decoupling may result in patterns of phenotypic stasis masking underlying genetic patterns.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2032-2048
Number of pages17
JournalEvolution
Volume76
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2022

Keywords

  • Morphological evolution
  • paleophylogeography
  • population structure
  • stasis
  • variation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Microevolutionary variation in molar morphology of Onychomys leucogaster decoupled from genetic structure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this