Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Mismatch compensation of CMOS current mirrors using floating-gate transistors

  • University of Maryland, College Park

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

The simple CMOS current mirror is a fundamental compositional element which is employed in a wide variety of analog and digital circuit designs. The use of CMOS current mirrors is appealing to circuit designers given the low cost associated with CMOS fabrication and the inherent simplicity of operation. Unfortunately, the simplicity of the CMOS current mirror makes it particularly susceptible to device mismatch due to process variations. In recent years the use of floating gate transistors for mismatch compensation has become increasingly popular. We report on our observations regarding the efficacy of this technique in both weak and strong inversion and present analytical and simulated results quantifying these observations. The central result is that although compensation using floating gates works well for correcting mismatch for subthreshold operation, similar compensation in above threshold operation results in the introduction of previously unseen mismatch effects.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2009 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, ISCAS 2009
Pages1823-1826
Number of pages4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009
Event2009 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, ISCAS 2009 - Taipei, Taiwan, Province of China
Duration: May 24 2009May 27 2009

Publication series

NameProceedings - IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems
ISSN (Print)0271-4310

Conference

Conference2009 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, ISCAS 2009
Country/TerritoryTaiwan, Province of China
CityTaipei
Period05/24/0905/27/09

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mismatch compensation of CMOS current mirrors using floating-gate transistors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this