TY - JOUR
T1 - Modeling Protein–Protein and Protein–Ligand Interactions by the ClusPro Team in CASP16
AU - Ashizawa, Ryota
AU - Kotelnikov, Sergei
AU - Khan, Omeir
AU - Li, Stan Xiaogang
AU - Glukhov, Ernest
AU - Cao, Xin
AU - Lazou, Maria
AU - Bekar-Cesaretli, Ayse
AU - Hailegeorgis, Derara
AU - Averkava, Veranika
AU - Zhu, Yimin
AU - Jones, George
AU - Yu, Hao
AU - Kalitin, Dmytro
AU - Stepanenko, Darya
AU - Koirala, Kushal
AU - Patsahan, Taras
AU - Beglov, Dmitri
AU - Lukin, Mark
AU - Joseph-McCarthy, Diane
AU - Simmerling, Carlos
AU - Tropsha, Alexander
AU - Coutsias, Evangelos
AU - Dill, Ken A.
AU - Padhorny, Dzmitry
AU - Vajda, Sandor
AU - Kozakov, Dima
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
PY - 2026/1
Y1 - 2026/1
N2 - In the CASP16 experiment, our team employed hybrid computational strategies to predict both protein–protein and protein–ligand complex structures. For protein–protein docking, we combined physics-based sampling—using ClusPro FFT docking and molecular dynamics—with AlphaFold (AF)-based sampling, followed by AF-based refinement. Our method produced numerous high-accuracy complex models, including cases where AF alone failed, underscoring the critical role of physics-based sampling alongside deep learning-based refinement. For protein–ligand docking, we integrated the ClusPro LigTBM template-based approach with a machine learning-based confidence model for rescoring. The method preserves conserved interaction fragments derived from homologous complexes, followed by local resampling using physics-based sampling and a diffusion model. Our template-based strategy achieved a mean lDDT-PLI of 0.69 across 233 targets, which was highly competitive. These results demonstrate that combining physics-based modeling with AI-driven refinement can significantly enhance the accuracy of both protein–protein and protein–ligand structure predictions.
AB - In the CASP16 experiment, our team employed hybrid computational strategies to predict both protein–protein and protein–ligand complex structures. For protein–protein docking, we combined physics-based sampling—using ClusPro FFT docking and molecular dynamics—with AlphaFold (AF)-based sampling, followed by AF-based refinement. Our method produced numerous high-accuracy complex models, including cases where AF alone failed, underscoring the critical role of physics-based sampling alongside deep learning-based refinement. For protein–ligand docking, we integrated the ClusPro LigTBM template-based approach with a machine learning-based confidence model for rescoring. The method preserves conserved interaction fragments derived from homologous complexes, followed by local resampling using physics-based sampling and a diffusion model. Our template-based strategy achieved a mean lDDT-PLI of 0.69 across 233 targets, which was highly competitive. These results demonstrate that combining physics-based modeling with AI-driven refinement can significantly enhance the accuracy of both protein–protein and protein–ligand structure predictions.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105019202058
U2 - 10.1002/prot.70066
DO - 10.1002/prot.70066
M3 - Article
C2 - 41115690
AN - SCOPUS:105019202058
SN - 0887-3585
VL - 94
SP - 183
EP - 191
JO - Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics
JF - Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics
IS - 1
ER -