Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Modeling Protein–Protein and Protein–Ligand Interactions by the ClusPro Team in CASP16

  • Ryota Ashizawa
  • , Sergei Kotelnikov
  • , Omeir Khan
  • , Stan Xiaogang Li
  • , Ernest Glukhov
  • , Xin Cao
  • , Maria Lazou
  • , Ayse Bekar-Cesaretli
  • , Derara Hailegeorgis
  • , Veranika Averkava
  • , Yimin Zhu
  • , George Jones
  • , Hao Yu
  • , Dmytro Kalitin
  • , Darya Stepanenko
  • , Kushal Koirala
  • , Taras Patsahan
  • , Dmitri Beglov
  • , Mark Lukin
  • , Diane Joseph-McCarthy
  • Carlos Simmerling, Alexander Tropsha, Evangelos Coutsias, Ken A. Dill, Dzmitry Padhorny, Sandor Vajda, Dima Kozakov
  • Stony Brook University
  • University of Texas at Austin
  • Boston University
  • New York University
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • NASU - Institute for Condensed Matter Physics
  • Lviv Polytechnic National University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

In the CASP16 experiment, our team employed hybrid computational strategies to predict both protein–protein and protein–ligand complex structures. For protein–protein docking, we combined physics-based sampling—using ClusPro FFT docking and molecular dynamics—with AlphaFold (AF)-based sampling, followed by AF-based refinement. Our method produced numerous high-accuracy complex models, including cases where AF alone failed, underscoring the critical role of physics-based sampling alongside deep learning-based refinement. For protein–ligand docking, we integrated the ClusPro LigTBM template-based approach with a machine learning-based confidence model for rescoring. The method preserves conserved interaction fragments derived from homologous complexes, followed by local resampling using physics-based sampling and a diffusion model. Our template-based strategy achieved a mean lDDT-PLI of 0.69 across 233 targets, which was highly competitive. These results demonstrate that combining physics-based modeling with AI-driven refinement can significantly enhance the accuracy of both protein–protein and protein–ligand structure predictions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)183-191
Number of pages9
JournalProteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics
Volume94
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2026

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Modeling Protein–Protein and Protein–Ligand Interactions by the ClusPro Team in CASP16'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this