Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

New evidence for strategic differences between static and dynamic search tasks: An individual observer analysis of eye movements

  • Appalachian State University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Two experiments are reported that further explore the processes underlying dynamic search. In Experiment 1, observers' oculomotor behavior was monitored while they searched for a randomly orientedT among oriented L distractors under static and dynamic viewing conditions. Despite similar search slopes, eye movements were less frequent and more spatially constrained under dynamic viewing relative to static, with misses also increasing more with target eccentricity in the dynamic condition. These patterns suggest that dynamic search involves a form of sit-and-wait strategy in which search is restricted to a small group of items surrounding fixation.To evaluate this interpretation, we developed a computational model of a sit-and-wait process hypothesized to underlie dynamic search. In Experiment 2 we tested this model by varying fixation position in the display and found that display positions optimized for a sit-and-wait strategy resulted in higher d0 values relative to a less optimal location.We conclude that different strategies, and therefore underlying processes, are used to search static and dynamic displays.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberArticle 8
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume4
Issue numberJAN
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Keywords

  • Eye movements
  • Memory in search
  • Search strategies
  • Visual search

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'New evidence for strategic differences between static and dynamic search tasks: An individual observer analysis of eye movements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this