Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Occupational exposure to arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead and nickel, and renal cell carcinoma: A case-control study from Central and Eastern Europe

  • Paolo Boffetta
  • , Luc Fontana
  • , Patricia Stewart
  • , David Zaridze
  • , Neonilia Szeszenia-Dabrowska
  • , Vladimir Janout
  • , Vladimir Bencko
  • , Lenka Foretova
  • , Viorel Jinga
  • , Vsevolod Matveev
  • , Helena Kollarova
  • , Gilles Ferro
  • , Wong Ho Chow
  • , Nathaniel Rothman
  • , Dana Van Bemmel
  • , Sara Karami
  • , Paul Brennan
  • , Lee E. Moore
  • CHU de Saint-Étienne
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Stewart Exposure Assessments, LLC
  • Blokhin Cancer Research Center
  • Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine
  • Palacký University Olomouc
  • Charles University
  • Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute
  • Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy
  • International Agency for Research on Cancer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

59 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the risk of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in Central and Eastern Europe in relation to exposure to known and suspected carcinogenic metals. Methods: During 1999-2003, the authors conducted a hospital-based study in Czech Republic, Poland, Romania and Russia, including 1097 cases of RCC and 1476 controls. Occupational exposure to arsenic, cadmium, chromium(III), chromium(VI), lead and nickel was assessed by teams of local industrial hygiene experts, based on detailed occupational questionnaires. Results: The ORs for RCC were 1.55 (95% CI 1.09 to 2.21) for exposure to lead and 1.40 (95% CI 0.69 to 2.85) for exposure to cadmium. No clear monotonic exposure-response relation was apparent for either duration of exposure or cumulative exposure to either metal, although the OR for the highest category of cumulative exposure to lead was 2.25 (95% CI 1.21 to 4.19). Exposure to other metals did not entail an increased risk of RCC. Conclusions: For cadmium, the lack of statistical significance of most results, potential confounding and the absence of clear dose-response relations suggest that an association with RCC is unlikely to be causal. In the case of lead, however, the elevated risk in the category of highest cumulative exposure is noteworthy and justifies further investigation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)723-728
Number of pages6
JournalOccupational and Environmental Medicine
Volume68
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Occupational exposure to arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead and nickel, and renal cell carcinoma: A case-control study from Central and Eastern Europe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this