Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Occupational exposures and odds of gastric cancer: A StoP project consortium pooled analysis

  • Shailja C. Shah
  • , Paolo Boffetta
  • , Kenneth C. Johnson
  • , Jinfu Hu
  • , Domenico Palli
  • , Monica Ferraroni
  • , Shoichiro Tsugane
  • , Gerson Shigueaki Hamada
  • , Akihisa Hidaka
  • , David Zaridze
  • , Dmitry Maximovich
  • , Jesus Vioque
  • , Eva M. Navarrete-Munoz
  • , Zuo Feng Zhang
  • , Lina Mu
  • , Stefania Boccia
  • , Roberta Pastorino
  • , Robert C. Kurtz
  • , Matteo Rota
  • , Rossella Bonzi
  • Eva Negri, Carlo la Vecchia, Claudio Pelucchi, Dana Hashim
  • Vanderbilt University
  • University of Ottawa
  • Harbin Medical University
  • Institute for the Study and Prevention of Cancer
  • University of Milan
  • National Cancer Center Japan
  • Nikkei Disease Prevention Center
  • Blokhin Cancer Research Center
  • CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP)
  • Miguel Hernández University
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • SUNY Buffalo
  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCS
  • Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • University of Brescia
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Gastric cancer pathogenesis represents a complex interaction of host genetic determinants, microbial virulence factors and environmental exposures. Our primary aim was to determine the association between occupations/occupational exposures and odds of gastric cancer. Methods: We conducted a pooled-analysis of individual-level data harmonized from 11 studies in the Stomach cancer Pooling Project. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of gastric cancer adjusted for relevant confounders. Results: A total of 5279 gastric cancer cases and 12 297 controls were analysed. There were higher odds of gastric cancer among labour-related occupations, including: agricultural and animal husbandry workers [odds ratio (OR) 1.33, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-1.68]; miners, quarrymen, well-drillers and related workers (OR 1.70, 95% CI: 1.01-2.88); blacksmiths, toolmakers and machine-tool operators (OR 1.41, 95% CI: 1.05-1.89); bricklayers, carpenters and construction workers (OR 1.30, 95% CI: 1.06-1.60); and stationary engine and related equipment operators (OR 6.53, 95% CI: 1.41-30.19). The ORs for wood-dust exposure were 1.51 (95% CI: 1.01-2.26) for intestinal-type and 2.52 (95% CI: 1.46-4.33) for diffuse-type gastric cancer. Corresponding values for aromatic amine exposure were 1.83 (95% CI: 1.09-3.06) and 2.92 (95% CI: 1.36-6.26). Exposure to coal derivatives, pesticides/herbicides, chromium, radiation and magnetic fields were associated with higher odds of diffuse-type, but not intestinal-type gastric cancer. Conclusions: Based on a large pooled analysis, we identified several occupations and related exposures that are associated with elevated odds of gastric cancer. These findings have potential implications for risk attenuation and could be used to direct investigations evaluating the impact of targeted gastric cancer prevention/early detection programmes based on occupation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)422-434
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Epidemiology
Volume49
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Keywords

  • Digestive system neoplasm
  • Environment and public health
  • Epidemiology
  • Gastric neoplasm

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Occupational exposures and odds of gastric cancer: A StoP project consortium pooled analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this