TY - JOUR
T1 - Occupational risks for lung cancer among nonsmokers
AU - Pohlabeln, Hermann
AU - Boffetta, Paolo
AU - Ahrens, Wolfgang
AU - Merletti, Franco
AU - Agudo, Antonio
AU - Benhamou, Ellen
AU - Benhamou, Simone
AU - Brüske-Hohlfeld, Irene
AU - Ferro, Gilles
AU - Fortes, Cristina
AU - Kreuzer, Michaela
AU - Mendes, Anabela
AU - Nyberg, Fredrik
AU - Pershagen, Göran
AU - Saracci, Rodolfo
AU - Schmid, Giovanni
AU - Siemiatycki, Jack
AU - Simonato, Lorenzo
AU - Whitley, Elise
AU - Wichmann, Heinz Erich
AU - Winck, Carlos
AU - Zambon, Paola
AU - Jöckel, Karl Heinz
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - We conducted a case-control study in 12 European study centers to evaluate the role of occupational risk factors among nonsmokers. We obtained detailed occupational histories from 650 nonsmoking cases (509 females/141 males) and 1,542 nonsmoking controls (1,011 females/531 males). On the basis of an a priori definition of occupations and industries that are known (list A) or suspected (list B) to be associated with lung carcinogenesis, we calculated odds ratios (ORs) for these occupations, using unconditional logistic regression models and adjusting for sex, age, and center effects. Among nonsmoking men, an excess relative risk was observed among those who had worked in list-A occupations [OR = 1.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.78-2.97] but not in list-B occupations (OR = 1.05; 95% CI = 0.60-1.83). Among nonsmoking women, there was an elevation of risk for list-A occupations (OR = 1.50; 95% CI = 0.49-4.53), although this estimate was imprecise, given that less than 1% of cases and controls were exposed. Exposure to list-B occupations was associated with an increase in relative risk (OR = 1.69; 95% CI = 1.09-2.63) in females, but not in males. Women who had been laundry workers or dry cleaners had an OR of 1.83 (95% CI = 0.98-3.40). Our findings confirm that certain occupational exposures are associated with an increased risk for lung cancer among both female and male nonsmokers; however, knowledge on occupational lung carcinogens is biased toward agents to which mainly men are exposed.
AB - We conducted a case-control study in 12 European study centers to evaluate the role of occupational risk factors among nonsmokers. We obtained detailed occupational histories from 650 nonsmoking cases (509 females/141 males) and 1,542 nonsmoking controls (1,011 females/531 males). On the basis of an a priori definition of occupations and industries that are known (list A) or suspected (list B) to be associated with lung carcinogenesis, we calculated odds ratios (ORs) for these occupations, using unconditional logistic regression models and adjusting for sex, age, and center effects. Among nonsmoking men, an excess relative risk was observed among those who had worked in list-A occupations [OR = 1.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.78-2.97] but not in list-B occupations (OR = 1.05; 95% CI = 0.60-1.83). Among nonsmoking women, there was an elevation of risk for list-A occupations (OR = 1.50; 95% CI = 0.49-4.53), although this estimate was imprecise, given that less than 1% of cases and controls were exposed. Exposure to list-B occupations was associated with an increase in relative risk (OR = 1.69; 95% CI = 1.09-2.63) in females, but not in males. Women who had been laundry workers or dry cleaners had an OR of 1.83 (95% CI = 0.98-3.40). Our findings confirm that certain occupational exposures are associated with an increased risk for lung cancer among both female and male nonsmokers; however, knowledge on occupational lung carcinogens is biased toward agents to which mainly men are exposed.
KW - Case-control study
KW - Gender
KW - Lung neoplasms
KW - Nonsmokers
KW - Occupation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0033839288
U2 - 10.1097/00001648-200009000-00008
DO - 10.1097/00001648-200009000-00008
M3 - Article
C2 - 10955405
AN - SCOPUS:0033839288
SN - 1044-3983
VL - 11
SP - 532
EP - 538
JO - Epidemiology
JF - Epidemiology
IS - 5
ER -